Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facing pressure, House OKs anti-harassment training
abcnews.go.com ^ | 11-29-2017 | ALAN FRAM

Posted on 11/29/2017 9:30:55 PM PST by Impy

Pressured to respond to burgeoning sexual misconduct allegations, the House easily approved a bipartisan measure Wednesday requiring annual anti-harassment training for lawmakers and aides after a debate that rang with lawmakers' own accounts of such episodes.

Voice vote passage came as Congress waged year-end battles over Republican tax cuts and a potential government shutdown but has been diverted to also address allegations against some of its own. The accused include liberal heroes Rep. John Conyers and Sen. Al Franken and far-right [sic] GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore of Alabama.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; feminazi; sexualharrasment
How is this enforceable? The constitution sets forth the requirements to be a member of Congress and attending mandatory sensitivity training isn't one of them.
1 posted on 11/29/2017 9:30:55 PM PST by Impy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Impy

Now how about releasing the names of those who got a share on the $17 million.


2 posted on 11/29/2017 9:32:39 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

We want our $$$$ back! Look into that!!!!


3 posted on 11/29/2017 9:36:05 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

NO! Expel the harassers. Elect moral legislators.


4 posted on 11/29/2017 9:37:08 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; justiceseeker93; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; stephenjohnbanker; ...

Section 2
1: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

2: No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

2.5? No Person shall be a Representative who shall not attend feminazi cuckold training on an annual basis.


5 posted on 11/29/2017 9:38:45 PM PST by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

If congressmen don’t KNOW that stripping down in their offices, masturbating in front of subordinates, texting their junk to ladies, or feeling the breasts of their constituents is wrong, these harrassment seminars won’t help.


6 posted on 11/29/2017 9:48:31 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

These people should take a pledge to the American people BEFORE they run and are elected that they are not and will not be perverts. More of the taxpayer dollars being wasted. Why?


7 posted on 11/29/2017 9:54:45 PM PST by Maudeen (http://www.thereishopeinJesus.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

An excellent point.

They do know of course, and don’t care.


8 posted on 11/29/2017 9:55:15 PM PST by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

A silly attempt at spinning the media their way.

Release the name of the $17 million payoffs AND all the other payoffs that weren’t included in the $17 mill.

Conyers avoided that list through his payoff scheme. There were other settlements made with taxpayer money outside that list.

Awan Brothers had the entire Congressional computers system hacked. So Iran and God knows what other countries know. This is BLACKMAIL material. We need to know who has been compromised.

Let the voters decide from there.


9 posted on 11/29/2017 9:56:06 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Unless the names of the pervert abusers are released...and the stolen money repaid...this is all PR bulls***. The idea of some kind of “class” is laughable. What a group of pathetic liars and enablers.


10 posted on 11/29/2017 10:00:34 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Impy

The leaders of our country need training to teach them not to hold staff meetings in their undershorts?

Do they need a mommy to hold a seminar to teach them to keep their hands to themselves?

Should they be spanked and told they should know better?
This is the legacy of Slick Willy, Admiral Ted Kennedy of the USS Oldsmobile with his waitress sandwich partner Chris Dodd, JFK, LBJ etc.

Make sure you take out all the potted plants out of your offices, also.

I am a grown up, they aren’t going to humor me with this stupid nonsense.


11 posted on 11/29/2017 10:23:45 PM PST by bobo1 (Truth has but only one voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

This is too rich.

They’ve, the polit-elites, have been so used to treating us peasants like children that they can’t help themselves and have now turned their benevolence onto themselves.


12 posted on 11/30/2017 1:31:54 AM PST by x1stcav (We have the guns. Do we have the will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Octogenarians respond well to training—not!


13 posted on 11/30/2017 4:42:49 AM PST by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Maybe if they need training on how to respect others and be a gentleman, they should not be in public office.


14 posted on 11/30/2017 4:44:21 AM PST by IamConservative (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

How about posting bigly a couple simple bible verses and incorporating them into how any person working in the House does all it’s daily business? A whole lot cheaper, quicker and will help in more areas of every person’s life than “anti-harrassment training”.


15 posted on 11/30/2017 4:46:27 AM PST by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; justiceseeker93; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker

Art. I, sec. 5, cl. 2:

“Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.”

If the House of Representatives (by majority vote) wishes to punish its Members for failing to attend annual “sexual-harassment training” sessions, it may do so. And if 2/3 of Representatives vote to expel a fellow Member for failing to attend such sessions, the House certainly would expel such Member.

What certainly would be unconstitutional would be if a House (or both Houses acting in concert) required attendance at such “training” sessions before permitting a Member-elect to be sworn in. The qualifications of Members are set forth in the Constitution, and neither Congress nor any state may add to such qualifications (any addition or modification of such qualifications would require a constitutional amendment).

I also think that it would be unconstitutional for a law (which, by definition, requires bicameralism and presentment) to state that a Member will be expelled if he or she does not attend such sessions, or even a law that stated that a Member will be expelled for engaging in sexual harassment (or rape or murder, for that matter), given that the power of expulsion of its Members is vested in *each House*, not in Congress as a whole. The House and Senate can adopt a “sense of the Congress” resolution or something to that effect, but the final decision to expel may be exercised exclusively by the Members of the House whose Member whose expulsion is being considered, and it only may occur with the vote of 2/3 of such House’s Members present and voting.


16 posted on 11/30/2017 4:51:14 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Impy

They don’t need training. They need to be arrested.


17 posted on 11/30/2017 4:55:29 AM PST by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson