Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
...but a locking device that trapped someone in the office would seem to be a clear violation of even a half-assed building code.

I'm quite certain that the building code violation was not even a consideration. The purpose of the device was to support predation - I have no doubt that it was against code never even entered their minds.

63 posted on 11/30/2017 7:56:12 AM PST by MortMan (I can resist anything, except temptation. /sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

The point is that Matt Lauer didn’t install it himself. Someone else had to do that, and that contractor or building custodian would likely know about things like a building code that Lauer and his enablers didn’t care about.


64 posted on 11/30/2017 8:06:01 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson