Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x1stcav

What was it about a guilty verdict for the crime of involuntary manslaughter that the court did not understand?


4 posted on 12/01/2017 2:46:17 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: equaviator

It was about giving the middle finger to President Trump.


5 posted on 12/01/2017 2:53:49 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: equaviator

He had a jury of his peers and in this case they really were his peers, they were as depraved and immoral as he is. What else would you expect of the majority vermin that slink around San Francisco?


16 posted on 12/01/2017 3:18:55 AM PST by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: equaviator

I agree. I understand that the bullet that killed her was a ricochet. But I also understand that he fired three shots. Firing three shots is not an “accident”. Maybe so for one shot. Also, you cannot fire three shots on the crowded San Francisco pier and NOT expect someone to be badly hurt. To me, those two facts make manslaughter a slam dunk.


43 posted on 12/01/2017 6:42:55 AM PST by RatRipper (Unindicted co-conspirators: the Mainstream Media and the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson