[blam]

She can win by alienating 50% of the voters?

You think all this craziness by Democrats isn't helping Republicans?

[gdzla]

Idiots. What next? Not to vote for an American?

[bagster]

directly implies that voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis

I'm gonna have to see some documentation on this. I don't much trust democrats or liberal lesbians.

Pics or it didn't happen.

[jmaroneps37]

We will see more of this as they continue to slide down hill.

[Williams]

Back in college 30 years ago female students were being forced into lesbian sex by the women’s lib professors. It’s worse now. Maybe they didn’t have penises (emphasis on maybe) but they still got the harassment job done.

[fwdude]

You think all this craziness by Democrats isn't helping Republicans?

Please tell me how and I will encourage it all the more.

[blam]

It’s okay that women are constantly showing their TITS in public.

[Mr_Moonlight]

voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis and therefore cannot sexually assault someone she works with

The issue is never the issue.
The issue is ALWAYS the revolution.

~ MM ~

[Dr. Sivana]

She can win by alienating 50% of the voters?

It can work in a multi-candidate primary.

[Slyfox]

Look at it this way. We want them saying as much stupid stuff as possible. They identify themselves as nuts and we know to avoid them and vote against them.

Plus, they aren't using the reasoning portion of their brains and as a result they don't have as many people on their side as they think they have.

[eyeamok]

voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis

What does she have to say about the Millions of females that wore their pussies on their heads for the whole world to see?? If that isn’t Sexual harassment on a grand scale by an entire sex, what is??

[Tonytitan]

... voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis...

I bet those hands can grab a dildo and hit someone over the head with it. That qualifies as sexual assault, doesn't it?

[Wyrd bið ful aræd]

Predicated on the notion that it is impossible for women to commit sexual harassment. The ad starts from a false premise.

[CygnusXI]

“If you get more women in office, if you get more women in positions of authority, you’re less likely to have issues where someone is pulling out their penis at an inappropriate time in the the workplace,”

She will just pull out her strap on.

[BookmanTheJanitor]

Cause when you think of protecting women...you think of Democrats.

[Brooklyn Attitude]

“Democrats Are Now Running Campaigns That Specifically Tell Voters Not To Vote For A Man...”

I think its time Repubs run campaigns telling voters that DemocRATS hate White people and America.

[chris37]

That’s interesting, because I have to say after last years election, I am no longer interested in female politicians whatsoever.

Find something else to do.

[gubamyster]

I’m not surprised & it will only get worse.

All white males are rapists & Nazis. The new mantra. Don’t hire them. Don’t vote for them.

[dowcaet]

Oh great. A midwestern Gloria Allred.

[LostPassword]

> “Who can you trust most not to show you their penis in a professional setting? That would be the candidate who doesn’t have one,”

How do we know which candidate doesn’t have a penis? According to her party, we can’t use man/woman or male/female as a way to say who does/doesn’t have a penis. She can’t be running as the “woman candidate” as a D (that would be offensive). What words has she come up with to distinguish “those with a penis” vs “those without a penis”?

Republicans in congress don’t help the confusion. They can’t show anyone their testicles in a professional setting without providing magnifying lens.

[Heart of Georgia]

I wondered who would be the first to campaign this way.