Because they’ve been accomplices to fake news/pushing a communist agenda for years. They’re not gonna rat on/out one of their own.
The snob from Waterloo, IA is on thin ice again.
When is Blowhard Baher from The Shrew going to be held accountable from spreading false news (gleefully)?
So which Rat mole at the FIB leaked the news to Ross?
And yet Know-It-Alls like Tom Hanks are troubled by Americans’s views of the media
What time does joy behar come on?
ping
The stock market is not ignoring the story...
Back in the good old days of the USSR, the state media never directly reported on industrial or transportation disasters. At least, the average Russian astute enough to decipher “the code” could figure it out; a seemingly irrelevant article on railroad safety precautions in Novosibirsk meant that there was a bad train wreck in Novosibirsk.
We just get lied to and the truth gets completely ignored, so in many ways the Soviet citizen was better informed than the average American is now.
They only had two options. Ignore the story, or express their deep disappointment that it was not true. So in their opinion, they took the high road.
RE: [Michael Flynns] prepared to testify that President Trump, as a candidate, Donald Trump, ordered him directed him to make contact with the Russians
QUESTION: Let’s say Trump did, is this illegal?
Is it not possible that one would want to talk to the Russians IN ANTICIPATION of an election victory?
Obama did something similar in his campaign. Here’s Kim Strassel of the WALL STREET JOURNAL:
KIM STRASSEL: I think we are having a discussion that is absolutely divorced from reality this week. It is astonishing. Let me set the scene for you. It’s 2008. We are having an election. And candidate Obama, he’s not even president-elect, sends William Miller over to Iran to establish a back channel and let the Iranians know that should he win the election they will have friendlier terms.
Okay, so this is a private citizen going to foreign soil obviously in order to evade U.S. intelligence monitoring and establishing a back channel with a sworn enemy of the United States who was actively disrupting our efforts in the military in the Middle East.
So is that bad judgment? Is that a bad thing that happened? Back channels are completely normal. They happen all the time. Reagan did them. Obama did them. Everyone did. So I’m not quite sure why supposedly having, at least the president’s now elected, setting up a back channel with the Russians is somehow out of bounds.
WHERE’s THE OUTRAGE? WHERE’s THE INVESTIGATION?
They’re in stun mode.
Lying through omission.
How was he not fired?
I cannot accept that someone could make so many egregious errors and keep his job. Why?
Was it Brian Ross that found a TEA Party contributor with the same last name as the Gabby Giffords shooter?
The Media works for the Deep State. The Media is an enemy of the Constitution and People of The United States.
The Media is Target Number One.
Brian Ross has been a biased lying propagandist for decades.
I really don’t expect networks to cover each other’s suspensions, it’s not news.
A reporter on fox business said they asked if Ross had made any market plays before the story was released and could not get a comment.
If Ross shorted any funds just before the release of this story he and the network are in big trouble. And yes I think they are dumb enough to have done that. Either way if they did it will come to light.
To which “false scoop” are they referring? I’m not clicking on a blog.