You are conflating (known in the vernacular as “blowing smoke”) all kinds of immigration issues with the simple issue of refundable tax credits for illegal aliens. The Congress, as part of this current tax legislation, should simply make it a requirement that to receive this credit, the tax filer can’t be here illegally and the tax filer must have their own verified social security number. Sorry you don’t comprehend that.
Frankly, I don’t care. People were talking about the topic and I entered what I found. As for comprehension, I understand what is being said. The unfortunate part of our laws is that not all issues are cut and dry after years of use and have loopholes or ways to work around them. And the laws that were ratified in the 1800’s have had a long time for liberal based lawyers to find those ways.
I gave the board the two organizations in charge making sure the laws are run properly, I displayed a way currently being used to accomplish the task, I even gave the board the number of the federal form to be used to do it. You got a complaint, call your congressman. But don’t question my voracity for showing you how from what I could find. If I’m wrong, show me how. Telling me I’m wrong because someone could do something brings up a question. This problem has been going on for many years. If it’s so easy to fix, and can be done without question or challenge, then why hasn’t it? And why haven’t the laws in place headed it off in the beginning before it reached a financial monster? I know personally that this has been going on since the early sixties at least with the use of migrant farm workers in central California where I was raised on a ranch. The birthing of illegal children to make them citizens is probably 75 if not more years old in that local. I can’t answer for the San Diego area or Texas, but in a piece I read one hospital in Dallas is birthing 70 babies a day and better than 2/3 of them on the average are anchor.
There are always loopholes. And if there aren’t, thee is always dishonesty by our government. Find it and I will stand right next to you in the argument.
As for conflating, there is no one anything when you work for government. Everything you do or discover is in pieces and has to be interpreted. So to say something could be easy is based upon one simple action is very limited for the whole. Too many possibilities. Like I said before, if it’s so simple, why hasn’t it been done?
rwood