Here’s the question, if Flynn lied to him, and he’s the primary witness how can they proceed against Flynn on his word as the primary witness?
>
Here’s the question, if Flynn lied to him, and he’s the primary witness how can they proceed against Flynn on his word as the primary witness?
>
Sorry, but you seem to think the Rule of Law is still alive and well in the once Republic of America.
Nothing about the unmasking, the NSA or FISA. As usual, govt presumes all prior steps to the CURRENT are valid/legal; everything prior is to be ignored and swept under the rug.