Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Doubles Down On ‘Energy Dominance,’ Puts Up Millions Of Acres In Alaska For Drilling
Dailycaller.com ^ | 1:58 PM 12/06/2017 | Tim Pearce Energy Reporter

Posted on 12/06/2017 12:17:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Meanwhile, the msm will chat up Jerusalem, Roy Moore, and THE SLURRING.

The behind the scenes work is the best

41 posted on 12/06/2017 1:22:37 PM PST by onona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“I didn’t realize we’re still importing 50%.”

US refineries buy oil from the source that is the least expensive delivered to their location. Oil is a commodity. It trades sells in price/ barrel. Much of that delivered price is a function of freight(shipping costs) to its location around the world.

It was explained to me once upon a time that some refineries are set up to process heavy crude oil. This is what countries like Venezuela export or the tar sands out of Alberta.

That is why the Keystone pipeline was so important to build. It lowered the cost/barrel to ship heavy crude to the refineries in LA & TX that are the most efficient in turning that oil into finished product. With Keystone completed the Canadian oil producer in Alberta can deliver their oil cheaper to TX than other sources in the world.

The Canadians are also building a pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific Ocean. Much of that oil will ship to refineries in California, OR & WA. These refineries currently get most of their oil from Alaska. However, these refineries are competing with what China, South Korea, Japan, etc. will pay for the same product.

JD Irving owns a refinery in St. Johns New Brunswick located on the Atlantic Ocean. It was built in that location so it could receive super tankers. However, when oil production from North Dakota increased due to fracking improvements they started shipping oil all the way to New Brunswick by train because it was cheaper than what could be delivered by boat.

So, Trump knows that if we increase supply overall, price will go down.


42 posted on 12/06/2017 1:29:54 PM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
“In the back of my head I still think of these resources as strategic assets. I don’t like the idea of selling them off cheap....”

Purchasing lease rights is cheap (relatively), you're right. The return of big $$$ is in royalties via oil & gas or mineral production covered by the leasing of mineral rights.

Not selling lease rights is zero. Repeat zero. It is every mineral rights owner's call whether to accept a lease bid or not. A bid consists of lump sum for the right to drill or dig as the case may be (small return) plus a royalty percentage from sale of the oil & gas, coal, mineral, etc. (big return). I own mineral rights. In one case, a dry hole for oil produced zero royalty thus just a modest payment for the lease, which was not renewed at the end of the lease term. In another case, there was first the small amount of the lease itself, oil was commercially produced and now I have a multi-decade of royalty payments coming in. Gotta love that fracing!

43 posted on 12/06/2017 1:30:53 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gogeo; DoughtyOne

Well so it is...even better. I’d still like to see it approach “Zero,” even though I doubt its possible.


44 posted on 12/06/2017 1:31:59 PM PST by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; TigersEye; Oynx; Marine_Uncle; ...
Great photos!

Critters waiting for the Global Warming,...trying to get a bit warmer!

45 posted on 12/06/2017 1:36:28 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: henkster

What Trump did was to put the market into play.

The people in the business will decide to participate or nt and to what extent.

He effectively destroyed the envirowacko’s foolish arguments.


46 posted on 12/06/2017 1:45:30 PM PST by Thibodeaux (2018 is looking good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux
“What Trump did was to put the market into play.
The people in the business will decide to participate or n(o)t and to what extent.
He effectively destroyed the envirowacko’s foolish arguments.”

Brilliantly said...

47 posted on 12/06/2017 1:52:35 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Also, the oil from ND and the shale oil from TX is Light Sweet Crude. This increase in production for this type of oil from fracking hurt the country of Nigeria greatly. That is because their oil is light sweet crude.

However, much of the new production out of Texas did not have the infrastructure in place to load railcars. The big refineries in Texas are not really set up to unload by the truckload. Therefore, these new Texas producers had to sell their oil at a discount to allow for it to be shipped to some place by truck tanker and then reloaded onto a railcar tanker.

Similarly, oil from Alberta can be shipped currently to Vancouver, BC by pipeline. However, you can not load a Supertanker ship at the port where the pipeline ends. Therefore, it needs to be transloaded from a smaller tanker ship to a super tanker before it ships across the ocean. These all drive up the cost delivered to it final destination wherever that may be in China, Japan, Korea, or the Pacific US.


48 posted on 12/06/2017 2:03:16 PM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We owe a lot to Sarah Palin for informing us about the Alaska Oil data and ANWR. She got it out there for discussion. Trump obviously has had talks with her about it.

Thank You Sarah Palin!

49 posted on 12/06/2017 2:10:19 PM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman
So much WINNING!!!

Note that the pace of the WINNING is increasing

...soon be up to ludicrous speed.

50 posted on 12/06/2017 2:17:31 PM PST by spokeshave (The Fake Media tried to stop us from going to the White House, I am President and they are not. DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Remember the campaign rallies? He said we will have so much winning that we will ask “please Mr. President” can we slow down the winning? Or words to that effect. And recall his reply? No. Lmao. MAGA.


51 posted on 12/06/2017 2:33:04 PM PST by Kudsman ( Anyone to the Right of Stalin is a Far Right Wing candidate to the Far Left Wing Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

.
Go Trump!

MAGA!
.


52 posted on 12/06/2017 2:36:30 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

.
Let economics prevail over politics!
.


53 posted on 12/06/2017 2:38:48 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

Thanks for your comments. Much appreciated.


54 posted on 12/06/2017 2:40:24 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl99

Thanks for the thoughts, and glad to hear that one lease paid off handsomely.

Cool.


55 posted on 12/06/2017 2:42:05 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: henkster

I still want profit incentives so we don’t have shortages, but I realize you want that also.


56 posted on 12/06/2017 2:43:41 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

Thanks for the mention. Sounds reasoned.


57 posted on 12/06/2017 2:46:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I do fervently recall that, during the campaigning, this wonderful Guy stated that we may get tired of winning.

Mr. President, my President, my Ronald Reagan on steroids President.....Sir, no, I will not tire of these winning ways, so keep on keepin’ on.


58 posted on 12/06/2017 2:47:37 PM PST by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I agree.


59 posted on 12/06/2017 2:50:15 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

“Keep on Trumpin’”


60 posted on 12/06/2017 2:54:03 PM PST by HandyDandy ("Do you think the rain will hurt the rhubarb?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson