Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76

Maybe I’m naïve, but I never thought of “Baby on Board” signs (usually in rear windows) as sanctimonious, but rather as there to encourage drivers nearby to drive more carefully because a collision could endanger a baby.


64 posted on 12/10/2017 4:11:45 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

To me, the “Baby on Board” are presumptuous because it infers that the rest of us would drive dangerously otherwise.


69 posted on 12/10/2017 4:19:07 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

To me, the “Baby on Board” are presumptuous because it infers that the rest of us would drive dangerously otherwise.


70 posted on 12/10/2017 4:19:07 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

Pretty naive to think that a person considering driving across the line or at double the speed limit would have second thoughts at the possibility that there might be a baby in a nearby vehicle.

About as naive, as that a person planning to shoot up a mall will see a “no guns allowed” sign, shrug in resignation, and go in search of an unposted venue for his malefactions.


95 posted on 12/10/2017 7:50:54 PM PST by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson