Posted on 12/11/2017 11:46:38 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
Conservative news outlets have been vocal in their skepticism toward colleges and universities while the liberal media has remained complicit in their overall approval. Now, as a more progressive generation of millennials finds itself increasingly unemployed or underemployed, it seems as though the left might be turning against academia.
Last week, the Atlantic, one of the Lefts longest-enduring supporters, published a blistering critique of todays college system from a tenured George Mason University professor. In the article, Bryan Caplan, a libertarian-leaning professor, decries higher education as wasteful and irrelevant. Caplan brilliantly points out what employers have known for years.
[D]espite the chasm between what students learn and what workers do, academic success is a strong signal of worker productivity The labor market doesnt pay you for the useless subjects you master; it pays you for the preexisting traits you signal by mastering them traits like intelligence, diligence and the ability to tolerate serious boredom.
Caplan argues that at least half of colleges financial value (if not more) lies in signaling rather than the actual knowledge that is gained from coursework. Instead of wasting time and money on irrelevant knowledge, schools should be preparing students for their future careers. To support his case, Caplan provides several statistics proving the pathetically limited amount of knowledge and skills retained by students from one year to the next.
Resisting claims that he is simply a cynic, Caplan explains that hes cynical about people. Students, teachers, and school officials have all contributed to the preservation of a flawed system that rewards students with inflated grades in irrelevant courses for unrelated jobs after graduation.
Meanwhile, the college-for-all mentality has ultimately caused runaway credential inflation. The amount of education required to do the same jobs continues to rise for no apparent reason. What happened to the value of work experience and on-the-job training?
Non-academic students are forced upon the college track and end up flunking out, wasting thousands of dollars along the way. Vocational paths are often given the cold shoulder, even though they can be a more direct path to a successful career.
Interestingly enough, the Atlantic actually published an opinion piece back in June 2008 by a community college professor who observed that while telling someone that college is not for him seems harsh and classist and British, many simply dont have the skills to succeed in high school, let alone college. If thats the case, why are they wasting time or money on the college route when other options exist?
The socialist mentality of college-for-all has destroyed the value of college and has done nothing to fill the noble jobs that remain vacant. When a progressive magazine has to point that out, its pretty obvious that were in trouble.
Brendan Pringle (@BrendanPringle) is a freelance journalist in California. He is a National Journalism Center graduate and formerly served as a development officer for Young America's Foundation at the Reagan Ranch.
Then those people could go back and study Art History when they retire.
It’s actually darn near a crime against humanity that vocational education is not the default high school curriculum. For the top 10% of students academically, great go to college. But for the other 90%, instead of experiencing failure, they could be on a path to success and six-figure income in just a few years. Instead, far too many just drop out altogether, or “graduate” to minimum wage, dead-end jobs.
You are right about the worthless degrees. What is needed is a marketable skill, not just an education.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.