Democrats Willing to Throw Endless Number of Liberal Men Overboard to Get Trump

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | December 12, 2017 | Rush Limbaugh

[Red Badger]

They don’t recognize ‘individuals’ in a commune............

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's far beyond time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon.  Lets do it today.  Please chip in.

President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America
President Donald J. Trump's address to the United Nations on 09/19/2017.

Ramirez political cartoon:  the Roy Moore Compass LARGE VERSION 12/11/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Garrison political cartoon:  Moore or Less LARGE VERSION 12/11/2017: LINK  LINK (scroll down) to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).

Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic.  If you opt not to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  LINK

Click above and pencil in your donation now.Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

[JohnyBoy]

The leftist morons at reddit believe that liberal men being purged is the work Roger Stone and Bannon.

[Crucial]

OK by me!

[OttawaFreeper]

Because this is the chief failure of socialism/command sorts of societies, in that they use tactics like these to divide and conquer, but ultimately the results are even more divisive and self contradictory.

[LS]

I ran the #s. There are about 140 harassment settled claims “out there” (30% of congress). We’re not even talking about the SENATE (30 members).

This means we’re looking at significant #s of WOMEN who will come out (Gills, FinkStink), etc.

[LS]

I ran the #s. There are about 140 harassment settled claims “out there” (30% of congress). We’re not even talking about the SENATE (30 members).

This means we’re looking at significant #s of WOMEN who will come out (Gills, FinkStink), etc.

[Crucial]

At this point, if you date at work, you are probably a fool.

[Slyfox]

CALLER: ... How can they come after Trump for unsubstantiated accusations when Clinton went on national TV and admitted his abuse?

Bill Clinton did get on national tv and said that he "had sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinski." But only after his DNA had been found on her blue dress.

So the caller was right.

[mewzilla]

If both parties signed non-disclosure agreements and private money was used for payoffs, is there any way to know about those settlements? Other than asking every member of the House and Senate if he/she has ever been a party to one.

[GOPJ]

Democrats bragged about being the ‘party of women’ - - champions of ‘Women’s Rights’.

WE NEVER MADE THAT CLAIM.

We’ve the Chauvinist Pigs, RIGHT? We should tell our guys’ to cool it... but there’s no reason to jump on the liberal elits’ hate men bandwagon.

Besides - this poster tells the truth - see if you can find the pattern.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQiTZrdVAAEXwaB.jpg

[robroys woman]

Well, fortunately for them, they have an endless supply.

[DoughtyOne]

Democrats Willing to Throw Endless Number of Liberal Men Overboard to Get Trump Make Fools of Themselves

Trump isn't going anywhere, but somehow he's going to arrive at re-election.

[timestax]

Democrats Willing to Throw Endless Number of Liberal Men Overboard to Get Trump

And it will all backfire, boomerang back to them.

[mewzilla]

Well, Franken hasn’t gone anywhere yet. As a stratagem, this is a real head scratcher. By the time Dems get through purging all the pervs who refuse to go quietly, Trump will have served 2 terms and be a great granddaddy....

[DoughtyOne]

I agree with your conclusion. I’m also surprised to hear folks reference Franken by saying something like, “Now that he’s gone...”

As you stated, he hasn’t gone anywhere, and the women are just fine with that evidently.

[lee martell]

The article repeats it’s paragraphs at least three times, but I get the message. I’m waiting for Phase Two; when the Democrat women are also sacrificed on the altar of Progressive Power Grabs. Wonder if Mad-Maxine Waters has anything to worry about? In her case, it would probably be misappropriation of federal funds to buy her new houses, cars and wigs.

[Bryanw92]

>>it looks like they’re willing to throw an endless number of people overboard

In the Progressive mind, these aren’t “people”. These are just men—unnecessary, disposable, replaceable men.

[rlmorel]

Bob Packwood is a great example of this dynamic. For years, he was the darling of the Left due to his being a reliable pro-abortion ally on the right.

He was a Republican counterweight to Republicans who might curtail wholesale abortion, so he was a maverick, and the press let him be. Kind of like John McCain, a tool.

As long as they needed him, he was their darling, and he was safe.

Then, in November 1992, as soon as the election was done, and an openly pro-abortion President had won the election, The Washington Post began running stories about Packwood and sexual harassment. (This pattern starting to look familiar, anyone?)

He was forced out, and replaced by...Democrat Tom Wyden, a far, far leftist who still holds office.

If there is anyone who doesn’t think this is a tool used by the Left, they aren’t paying attention.