Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/13/2017 4:42:22 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oshkalaboomboom

I know that what happened is terrible, and the family is understandably extremely distraught, and the policeman will probably be a wreck for the rest of his life, however.

I was raised in Texas in the 60’s and 70’s. I remember driving courses and weapons ranges. I remember the policeman visiting the school. And I remember my dad and mom both giving me the talk.

If a cop approaches the vehicle, both hands on steering wheel, do not move till he tells you to move.

If you drink and play with guns, you will probably have a short and painful life. BB guns are guns, not toys, treat them with respect.

Stupid games deserve stupid prizes.

Policemen have guns, do not argue with them. Better to argue with the judge and a lawyer.

No, Daniel Shaver did not deserve to die, but the girl walking down a dark alley at two in the morning as the bars were emptying did not deserve to be raped either.

But stupid games earn stupid prizes.


2 posted on 12/13/2017 4:49:52 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
Scared *cops* are scary...scared *people* are scary.Self preservation and propagation are the two most basic and most powerful drives in human beings.

There are many,many,many,*many* bad and dangerous people in this country...most of them males.Cops,not being mind readers,can never be sure if a particular individual is gonna attack them.

As a result it's always good a idea when interacting with a cop to not resist,not to mouth off,not to make gestures or say things that could be interpreted as threatening.This is doubly true for guys.

In the three police encounters I've had in my 70 years (yes,I've led a *dull* life) I've followed those very rules and,as a result,the worst thing that ever came from these three encounters was one ticket for $100 (which I fought in court and won).

3 posted on 12/13/2017 4:57:28 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Remember: All Cultures Are Equal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

The solution is to remove LEO immunity to civil suit.and require, as a condition of employment, that LEOs must purchase malpractice insurance...JUST LIKE DOCTORS, NURSES, AND LAWYERS. If they cost the insurer more than the actuaries deem reasonable, they will be unemployable in law enforcement.


4 posted on 12/13/2017 5:05:12 AM PST by Zippo44 (Liberal is just another word for poltroon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

the video strongly suggests it was murder. The evidence not allowed concerning police record suggest the police jury of peers was in error. I would normally defer to the police -but what has been presented in this case —I cannot accept the results. I hope the civil suit results in conviction/justice.


6 posted on 12/13/2017 5:14:44 AM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

In all fairness, these officers got a call of a gunmen, perhaps a nightmare scenario, much like the deadly Texas tower shootings. At best a rifle assassin against an unknown or random target or targets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Joseph_Whitman

This meant that time was of the essence, that they were entering a very dangerous situation where there was a good chance that they were outgunned, where there might even be booby traps. Utterly terrifying to a cop.

Ironically, this is a situation where an ordinary person could find themselves plunged as well, the only armed person able to stop a crazed gunman or terrorist. The only difference being that they could only react once the shooting had begun. The officers didn’t have that grace.

The rest of it was the fault of the decedent, that when faced off against a brandishing police officer, your actions must be very slow and methodical as you do exactly what you are told.

The one exception is if the officer tells you to do something that you think might look like a threat to him, or immediately threatens you.

The axiom to this is when two officers are both shouting conflicting orders at you from two different angles. Which is extremely bad.


21 posted on 12/13/2017 5:57:35 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

After watching the video, this was an execution, pure and simple. That cop should be facing life imprisonment at the very least,if not the death penalty.


29 posted on 12/13/2017 6:11:43 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
The case in MN driver was not trying to pull out his license but his pistol that he just told the cop that he had.

The cop told him 3 times "Don't pull it out".

In the Slager case he fought with the guy for minutes before the shooting.

All different scenarios.

In the Shaver case the shooting was absolutely inexcusable.

34 posted on 12/13/2017 6:20:25 AM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Did anybody ever say what the victim was reaching for? He was so determined to reach behind his back he must have had something.


40 posted on 12/13/2017 6:27:32 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom; Alaska Wolf; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; napscoordinator; Shimmer1; ...
JBT Ping list

Could go either way...

You have some control over which way...

64 posted on 12/13/2017 6:59:01 AM PST by null and void (The internet gave everyone a mouth. It gave no one a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Scared Cops Are Scary

Any one that does not feel fear is a fool!


66 posted on 12/13/2017 7:11:16 AM PST by JayAr36 (Sliding into Socialism daily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

I was in the sandbox in the eighties during the “Tanker Wars”

Our Rules of Engagement during that deployment was a defensive posture. This meant that we could only defend ourselves against actual aggression - we could only fire if someone shot at us or we had a *verified* threat. In other words, we were required to assess and guarantee the threat before opening fire.

Later, during Desert Storm and the endless garbage that followed, the ROE was a combat posture: Shoot at the enemy, or anyone who seems to threaten you. The latter because lots of enemy fighters chose to wear civilian clothes. Or were women. Or kids. You were expected to exercise judgment, but if you truly felt that you were in danger, you were cleared to shoot.

What the police and their apologists want is combat posture ROE. And if that’s their ROE, then who is the enemy?

Us. Everyone who isn’t a cop. It has to be - there isn’t anyone else...

And we could be anyone - because we don’t wear uniforms. We could be a man, a woman, a child...

Even scarier is that this is pretty much what the courts, other cops and their apologists have given them. After any shoot, the thin blue line forms a protective wall around the shooter. And if they do happen to go to trial, all they have to do is say they were afraid and even the juries are instructed to give them leeway.

Cops should be on “defensive” ROE. They should only be allowed to fire if fired upon, or there is a genuine threat assessed and verified. If they fail to do this and shoot an innocent person they should go to jail - forever.

Why? First of all because they *asked* for the job - no one forced them to become a police officer. Secondly, they’re *supposed* to be better than everyone else - at least that’s what we’re told. They’re “heroes” for doing nothing more than putting on a uniform and wearing a badge. Finally, they’re supposedly very well-trained - which is why they get to walk around in tacti-cool gear wearing shooting glasses and carrying loaded Glocks and AR-15’s.

Shooting when you’re in *fear* of losing life or limb is a defense for a civilian - not a trained police officer.

The reality is that being a cop is *dangerous* - which means that sometimes (often depending on where you’re a cop) you will be afraid. If you can’t control your fear and remain calm enough to assess and verify an actual threat to your life prior to opening fire, you shouldn’t be a cop.

Go wash cars or something.


91 posted on 12/13/2017 11:53:49 AM PST by DBG8489
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Do not Screw with cops with guns.

Their lives are on the line


119 posted on 12/15/2017 10:49:16 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson