I think he was just ion tucker- It sounded pretty much like toothless letter- He’s basically saying (If he was the same fella on tucker) that they can issue subpoenas but are powerless to enforce them if the FBI doesn’t wish to provide the info-
Dershowitz was on right after basically saying kind of the same thing, and stating that he doesn’t feel hillary should have been found guilty even though she and huma and FBI destroyed evidence- tucker essentially agreed- saying he broke with some conservative friends on the conviction issue- it was bizarre to hear both the first segment saying congress is powerless to enforce subpoenas and then tuck and dersh not feeling that public officials should be held accountable for destroying potentially devastating info
He has obediently returned home to his 1990s place on the Clinton ranch. Listening to his ham radio.
That is either BS from Johnson or, more likely, he doesn't know what he is talking about.
Read:
Inherent contempt
Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation).
Oommarm Sen Johnson