Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memphis City Council Orders the removal of Gen. Forrest Statue
Self | 12-20-2017 | Self

Posted on 12/20/2017 5:18:48 PM PST by vetvetdoug

The Memphis City Council has ordered the removal of the NB Forrest Statue that sits on top of the graves of General and Mrs. NB Forrest. This action breaks several laws and the order of the State for Memphis to not make any action toward the historical monument and grave site.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: bluezones; civilwar; democrats; dixie; dixiepurge; fortpillowmassacre; generalforrest; henning; jimstrickland; kkk; liberalagenda; memphis; mississippiriver; nathanbedfordforrest; purge; revisionism; statueremoval; statues; tennessee; urban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Uncle Sham

‘It was about keeping a subserviant section of the country in the south subserviant to it’s masters in the north.’

yawn...


41 posted on 12/20/2017 7:20:04 PM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Whether we all agree with what took place or not, the fact is many of these Civil War men served with honor against us.
*****************
Keep his statue for a museum, but know that Forrest was no Lee or Jackson. The unit under his command massacred black POW’s without mercy. After the war, he became active in the KKK.


42 posted on 12/20/2017 7:43:23 PM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eldoradude

Wow, you swallowed the SJW’s version of history, hook. line, and sinker.


43 posted on 12/20/2017 7:50:26 PM PST by zipper (In their heart of hearts, every Democrat is a communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Okay, then I would consider that a valid reason to take statuary down.

As for flat headstones, leave them.

It’s a matter of tangible evil, and yes this man did exist and did those things. I would not want someone to claim he never existed, and thus couldn’t have done those things.

Killing POWs is not my idea of justice. If we’re talking war crimes and they get a hearing and are found to be deserving, I would alter my thoughts.

If it was just Black POWs, that’s quite disgusting, outrageous.

That right there tells me what his reason was for joining the Klan. It really rubs me the wrong way the abuse these guys leveled on Blacks for little or nothing at all.

By the time “Sheets Byrd” came around, it was quite clear what the Klan had become, and it’s incredible to me that the Democrats let him stay in the Senate.

Pretty much confirms the party of the Klan.

I will say that Republicans ruled the roost at times, and did nothing to remove him. That’s on them too.


44 posted on 12/20/2017 7:58:59 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

That’s a really impressive argument you put forth. The south simply wanted to go it’s own way. Why was this not good enough for the north? How could anyone in the north claim any sort of ownership over the future of the south to the point of killing 700,000 men in the prime of their lives? We are told it was to “end” slavery. Slavery was no longer the north’s problem when the entire south went it’s own way. The north didn’t fight a war with Mexico, or Cuba to “end” slavery there. Why then, was ending slavery so big a deal in the south once it was no longer a part of the United States? The answer, as always is “follow the money”. The north was stealing too much money from the south to give it up. Keep yawning. Your version of history no longer sells.


45 posted on 12/20/2017 8:08:38 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Nashville news just mentioned this and showed video of a crane lifting it. It’s gone. Actually, two statues were removed but I didn’t catch where the other one was.


46 posted on 12/20/2017 8:09:29 PM PST by radu (God bless our military men and women, past and present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

I think you have been greatly mislead about Forrest’s involvement with the KKK. First, he wasn’t a founder. Second, he ordered it disbanded when the former Confederates were allowed to vote again and it resorted to violence. The KKK as we know it didn’t resurface until after his death in 1876. That’s the problem, people like to repeat false history and don’t take the time to see the facts.


47 posted on 12/20/2017 8:22:45 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

That’s sort of what I thought I’d heard.

That the KKK was NOT the “burning and lynching” society it became later.

But I really don’t know much about it.

Anyway, Forrest himself has never sounded like a terrible guy.


48 posted on 12/20/2017 8:29:28 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Sherman himself led the court of inquiry about the "Fort Pillow Massacre" and exonerated General Forrest and his men. One needs to educate themselves on why Ft. Pillow was targeted, what the garrison did to try to defeat the Confederates and the trap that went astray causing the troops inside to refuse to surrender. The Unionists in Ft. Pillow were members of the Tennessee 13th and 6th who committed many war crimes and were "grubbing up" the countryside nearby which were the homes of Forrest's men. The report of a massacre was first from a Unionist newspaper in Memphis, The Avalanche that made the report of a massacre which was intended to cause the black troops to fight harder believing that they would be massacred if captured in subsequent battles. The facts of Ft. Pillow are incorrect when distilled down to just a "massacre" of POW's.
49 posted on 12/20/2017 8:31:02 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Thank you. I appreciate the clarification.

You know, on maters like this and other things on this forum, it’s often a good idea to stand back and let things be revealed before taking a position.

Should have gone with that idea here early on.


50 posted on 12/20/2017 8:34:44 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
The first Klan was just one of a number of guerrilla groups that resisted the Northern occupation (Reconstruction) of the defeated South. Confederate veterans were disenfranchised and the newly freed slaves were exploited by Northern carpetbaggers and Southern scalawags, who took over the Southern state houses, stole farms from their rightful owners, and imposed heavy taxes and martial law. The first Klan was the equivalent of the French Resistance or the Polish Underground in World War II. Only the agreement to withdraw Federal occupation forces as part of a deal that permitted the electoral votes of two Southern states to support the Republican Presidential candidate, Rutherford Hayes, ended Reconstruction. The Klan and similar groups disbanded. The second Klan, which was established 40 years after the end of Reconstruction, had no continuity with the first Klan. The second Klan, which was actually stronger in Northern and Western states like Indiana and Oregon, had anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, and anti-immigrant ideologies, not just merely anti-black.
51 posted on 12/20/2017 8:54:20 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Hisotry of the Ku Klux Klan
52 posted on 12/20/2017 9:09:11 PM PST by eldoradude (Keep calm...we'll get to the carrion part later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: eldoradude

Yes, the usual pap.

They limp in people who are against illegal immigration, and uncontrolled borders by innuendo.

Sorry, that’s not anything like the KKK. We don’t advocate violence, only demand our laws to be enforced.

Thanks for the link.


53 posted on 12/20/2017 9:28:50 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn

December 20, 2017 - the night racism ended in Memphis, Tennessee. This is just so much BS!


54 posted on 12/20/2017 9:46:39 PM PST by NCC-1701 ((You have your fear, which might become reality; and you have Godzilla, which IS reality.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: radu

The other statue was of Jefferon Davis. It was in a park overlooking the Mississippi River not too far fron NBF’s statue.


55 posted on 12/20/2017 9:50:43 PM PST by NCC-1701 ((You have your fear, which might become reality; and you have Godzilla, which IS reality.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

Thanks. Had a little distraction in here with cats while they were talking about it and I missed where it was.


56 posted on 12/20/2017 10:03:01 PM PST by radu (God bless our military men and women, past and present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

From the article.. “The two park properties were transferred to a nonprofit called Memphis Greenspace for $1,000 each. The group’s director is Van Turner, a Shelby County commissioner.

Strickland said the purchase and removal were privately funded. It is not known where the statues will go. Memphis Greenspace will maintain the parks.“


57 posted on 12/20/2017 10:05:15 PM PST by pnz1 (#IMNOTWITHHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eldoradude

Where the hell did your quote come from? There’s no attribution. Wikipedia? Lately that source has become heavily politicized.


58 posted on 12/20/2017 10:45:11 PM PST by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

Wasn’t UT wanting one of these properties for something?


59 posted on 12/20/2017 11:04:35 PM PST by pnz1 (#IMNOTWITHHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Taliban America claims another victory


60 posted on 12/20/2017 11:08:33 PM PST by Pelham (all warfare is based on deception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson