Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aynrandfreak

Under an analysis using a calculator from the University of Michigan’s Population Studies Research Center, the current population estimates would have the following effect on representation in the 435-seat Congress.
Gain seats:
Colorado +1
Florida +1
North Carolina +1
Oregon +1
Texas +2
Lose seats:
Illinois -1
Michigan -1
Minnesota -1
New York -1
Pennsylvania -1
West Virginia -1


10 posted on 12/20/2017 6:12:50 PM PST by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is on twitter @SarahMGellar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: SMGFan

Crap, you posted that while I still typing my reply.


15 posted on 12/20/2017 6:15:31 PM PST by lightman (ANTIFA is full of Bolshevik.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

Only Red State to lose a seat is WVA. Blue States lose 5 seats.

That would take effect after the next redistricting round in 2022 and show up for the 2024 and 2028 presidential elections.

Of course no state would lose House seats if the size of the House was increased.


22 posted on 12/20/2017 6:24:19 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

I wouldn’t be surprised to see New Jersey added to the list of states losing a House seat. Most states lose seats because their population is growing very slowly compared to other states. There are counties in New Jersey that have actually lost population since 2010.


24 posted on 12/20/2017 6:24:36 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
Gain seats:

Colorado +1
Florida +1
North Carolina +1
Oregon +1
Texas +2

Lose seats:

Illinois -1
Michigan -1
Minnesota -1
New York -1
Pennsylvania -1
West Virginia -1

NET:

Red +2
Blue -1
Purple -1

Overall, a wash.

Machts nicht.

37 posted on 12/20/2017 6:59:02 PM PST by lightman (ANTIFA is full of Bolshevik.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
The problem is only that people are moving from blue states to red and continue to vote Democrat.

41 posted on 12/20/2017 7:21:37 PM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

When these blue states send us their people, they aren’t sending their best. The are sending Democrats.


55 posted on 12/20/2017 8:03:09 PM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

You can even build a trend package off this for 2030, and project out that Illinois will likely lose at least one...maybe even two in the 2030 episode. I would suggest that Michigan goes down another in 2030 as well.

I think the more interesting thing here is that you have eleven states where district lines have to be redrawn in 2020/2021. There will be intense battles over the new districts created.


62 posted on 12/20/2017 9:18:46 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
From a May article in US News & World Report, here was the prediction:

Alabama -1
Arizona +1
Colorado +1
Florida +2
Illinois -2
Michigan -1
Minnesota -1
Montana +1
New York -1
North Carolina +1
Ohio -1
Oregon +1 (siphon vote from CA no doubt)
Pennsylvania -1
Rhode Island -1
Texas +3, perhaps +4
West Virginia -1

65 posted on 12/20/2017 9:38:53 PM PST by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson