Skip to comments.
Jill Stein says Americans need to 'see the evidence of Russian culpability' in election meddling
Fox News ^
Posted on 12/23/2017 4:48:39 AM PST by Libloather
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein told Fox News Thursday night that Americans "have yet to see the proof" that Moscow meddled in last year's election.
Stein confirmed earlier this week that the Senate Intelligence Committee had contacted her campaign to request documents, including emails, as part of its investigation into Russian activities and alleged collusion between campaigns and foreign interests.
"I think there are legitimate aims here in the investigation," Stein told Fox News' "Tucker Carlson Tonight." "Interference in our election is much bigger than the Russians and ... I would like to see the evidence of Russian culpability here."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: election; greenparty; hillary; jillstein; russia; russian; stein; thirdparty; trumprussia
Lock her up.
To: Libloather
Stein,you’ve been noticed!
2
posted on
12/23/2017 4:50:16 AM PST
by
Dr. Ursus
To: Dr. Ursus
To: Dr. Ursus
Antifa-Crat 2020 ticket Franken/Stein
4
posted on
12/23/2017 5:05:15 AM PST
by
CMailBag
To: shelterguy
NUTS?
No, Stein like every other socialist/communist crap is blind.
Hillary and the DNC paid foreign entities and scum such as Christopher Steele for the Dossier on Trump.
Right in front of you is the Russian input to the RATS.
5
posted on
12/23/2017 5:12:34 AM PST
by
politicianslie
(Lying to Americans is easy-Presstitutes repeat what they are told to say and they say it 24/7)
To: Libloather
I totally agree.
The Russians colluded with GPS Fusion to influence and election, and now they are using it in an attempt to overthrow a duly elected President.
6
posted on
12/23/2017 5:17:08 AM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
To: Libloather
Guess the Rooskies chose not to help her in the recounts?
7
posted on
12/23/2017 5:27:25 AM PST
by
ealgeone
To: Libloather
She colluded with H! to deny the voters their choice.
8
posted on
12/23/2017 5:27:52 AM PST
by
Principled
(IG: @oversight.gov follow it!)
To: Libloather
Dear Leftists. Add 2+2.
Since the Clinton campaign did what had to be done to eliminate Crazy Bernie, does it not stand to reason that Clinton would resort to any means necessary to defeat Donald Trump?
9
posted on
12/23/2017 5:49:15 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: Libloather
Dear Jill:
There is tons of evidence of Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Just do a Google search on Dossier - Mueller - Global GPS and you can read all about it.
10
posted on
12/23/2017 6:05:23 AM PST
by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. About time)
To: Libloather
11
posted on
12/23/2017 6:20:16 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Travis McGee
Hillary lost because the Dems didn’t figure out how to cheat well enough to overcome the votes of everyone who dreaded the thought of Hillary being Prez and went out to vote like their lives depended on it.
12
posted on
12/23/2017 6:34:21 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
(I'm conservative & traditionalist, a nationalist and patriot.)
To: Libloather
"...I would like to see the evidence of Russian culpability here."
Exactly where is the evidence? Show us! It has been over one year and still no evidence.
13
posted on
12/23/2017 6:53:01 AM PST
by
Lockbox
To: Libloather
They didn’t need any proof when they thought it was Trump colluding with the Russians.
14
posted on
12/23/2017 7:08:59 AM PST
by
Kid Shelleen
(Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
To: Libloather
She sees evidence where there is none; probably hears voices, too.
15
posted on
12/23/2017 7:23:24 AM PST
by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Libloather. Yes Jill, we know this. And there isn't any such evidence, because it didn't happen. And if there were such evidence, it wouldn't take the form of DNC- and Hitlery-financed oppo research compiled by a supposed former UK spy, now would it?
and while a stopped clock is right twice a day, in case we all forget, boy is she nuts:
and this? I'm including it, just because it makes me laugh, and because it deserves the "No **** Sherlock" prize for this century:
Considering how much the Hitlery machine and the Soetero hoodlums have managed to **** up things without having won the 2016 election, well, do I need to complete that thought?
16
posted on
12/23/2017 7:25:43 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: Libloather
Hey Jill,
YOU had dinner with Putin. Why didn’t you just ask him if he and Trump colluded??
What a dolt.
To: Kid Shelleen
They never believed that.
18
posted on
12/23/2017 7:29:40 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
To: shelterguy
Yes, Jill Stein is nuts ... but her take on the Russian election conspiracy theories is less insane than CNN’s and the Democrat Party’s.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson