GISS at Columbia needs to be defunded.
In real science, when the data disagrees with the theory, you alter the theory. In climate “science”, when the data disagrees with the theory, they alter the data. It’s not science.
NASA/GISS Past temps are no longer fixed.
Past temps are part of an algorithm.
An algorithm which is programmed to show an increase.
It’s worthless.
Science is not objective ‘science’ anymore, it is politically influenced outcomes.......
The DMSP spacecraft is the only spacecraft that has measured the Earth’s temperature in every square kilometer since the early 1960’s. It has recorded a temp DROP of 0.02 degrees in that period.
About the author: “Randall Hoven is a retired Boeing technical fellow with a bachelor’s degree and two master’s degrees in engineering, which is two more master’s degrees than Bill Nye the Science Guy has. He teaches at a university now, not on TV.”
LOL!
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
I find this post to be one of the most interesting I’ve read in a while. I’ve been reading about temperature data for years and want to be as informed as possible.
The most frustrating thing for me here is, as mentioned in the article, is that NASA and others keep adjusting the temperatures and removing their old data, making it very difficult if not impossible to determine true temperature increases, if any.
I also find NASAs sea level rise to be completely bogus and I’m probably going to have the same issues with their sea level data.
Knowing both areas (temperature and sea level) change (or so-called change) very well and being able to explain that to others is something I think is very important. Well, at least to me.
It is models all the way down.
It is all a fraud. A hoax.
More tree rings.
Climate Change is much stronger than the deniers will acknowledge. It can even change climate that occurred many years ago.
How would this work in other areas? Suppose I have an auto accident case and my expert gets up on the stand to give an opinion that it was all the defendant’s fault. Then comes the cross-examination: Mr. Expert, you based your opinion on 110 feet of skidmarks. But you didn’t measure the skidmarks. By the time you were retained, the road had been repaved and no skidmarks were visible from this accident. And isn’t it a fact that when the skidmarks were measured by the highway patrol shortly after the accident, they measured 93 feet of skidmarks?
There goes my case.
Apparently it is past time to do monthly archives of the “current” data. Wonder if the wayback machine has past data?