[theoilpainter]

No - it’s an easy choice. We must retain the seat or kiss off any of Trump’s judicial picks. Romney is harmless - he has no greater ambitions. And he will vote for the judicial picks.

He’s ok - not my first choice, but far better than ANY Dem.

[novemberslady]

Romney is harmless - he has no greater ambitions...


hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

would you like to buy a bridge?

[exit82]

not my first choice, but far better than ANY Dem.

LOL--that was the argument I used to convince myself to vote for him in 2012.

If we gain more Senate seats in 2018, Mitt will be less of a problem.

[Lady Heron]

Romney is anything but harmless....absolutly no thanks.

[Bubba_Leroy]

We must retain the seat or kiss off any of Trump’s judicial picks.

I agree that electing Senator Mittens is better than electing Senate Majority Leader Schumer.

If the democrats retake the House, then the first order of business for Speaker of the House Pelosi will be passing articles of impeachment against President Trump. If the democrats retake the Senate, then Senate Majority Leader Chuckie Schumer will never allow another Trump nominee to get to the floor for a vote.

The time for knocking out RINOs is in the primaries. In the general election, if your only choice is a RINO or a democrat, vote for the RINO, and then work like hell in the next primaries to have better choices.

[so_real]

He’s ok - not my first choice, but far better than ANY Dem.

No, he's not! Having an "R" behind his name does not make him a conservative. Romney is the founder of republican socialized "medicine" and homosexual "marriage". Massachusetts moved from the second-largest debtor state to the largest debtor state in the nation under Romney's watch. Everything about that sleezebag screams progressive liberal democrat. A case could be made for just about any one of the Blue Dog Democrats as being far better than Romney.