Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA
Murphy even suggested challenging the law in court on constitutional grounds because of the SALT deduction cap.

Here is the text of the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

Amendment 16 - (Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratified February 3, 1913) - The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

It should not take a "constitutional scholar" to see that the new federal tax law is NOT unconstitutional.

And to think, it was "progressives" who pushed for that stupid amendment in the first place...

2 posted on 01/03/2018 8:02:52 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS
"It should not take a "constitutional scholar" to see that the new federal tax law is NOT unconstitutional."

I'm sure that their claim, whatever it might be, won't be based on an infringement of the 16th. Most likely it will be an equal protection claim. That would still be very dubious since the rules apply equally to residents of all states, and it's only the behavior of the states themselves that lead to different results.

38 posted on 01/03/2018 9:32:39 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson