Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aliska
was upset at the time but didn't understand well I could see it but never was sure who started the fire.

One video I saw seemed to show the last few dribbles of napalm dripping from a short nozzle on the left front of the tank which had just been driven through the wall of the building.

Either way, anyone who ordered/approved CS gas to be used against civilians in an enclosed space, let alone against women & children, should be doing hard time for attempted murder.

21 posted on 01/03/2018 12:42:36 PM PST by BwanaNdege ("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: BwanaNdege

Not to mention what would happen CS gas when burned.

Anyone that knowingly introduced CS into a confined space where kerosene or propane lanterns & stoves were being used, and then knock open a few ventilation holes in the structure for good airflow — well, sir. That goes beyond attempted murder. That’s premeditated, cold blood killing in an agonizing way right there.


45 posted on 01/03/2018 1:18:05 PM PST by L,TOWM (I don't have a preference for politician or a party. I have God and His standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege
The propellant was a flammable liquid - mostly likely the source of the massive fire 🔥 given the massive amounts they injected into the building.
58 posted on 01/03/2018 2:21:44 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson