On the contrary, I was diligently seeking reasoned debate. My guesses were only trying to convey my attempts to understand your position.
In your original post to me, you made three statements. Since I agreed 100% with the first and last, the middle one—"Your assumption re Trump is way off"—was puzzling. So, I asked you to explain.
But, rather than engage in reasoned debate, you responded with insults.
So, if you're genuinely interested in some reasoned debate, I'll try once more: Do tell me what it IS that you perceive to be my "assumption" about Trump.
You post like a concern troll.
My only "concern" is in seeking some common ground and/or understanding our differences while, so far, you appear to be hell-bent on making an enemy where there may be none.
You're dismissed
LOL. Not so fast, FRiend. Now, I see we've both been here for the better part of 20 years. Am I forgetting... Did we lock horns somewhere along the way such that I should be spitting nails at you?
Gee, I don’t know.
I don’t keep track of those that lock horns with me.
And if I did, I sure wouldn’t spit nails at them as you say you would.
I’m not trying to make an enemy, just looking for clarification and calling out posts that seem emotional and not factual.
The example being your words “Trump has clearly indicated he is willing to let the “dreamers” stay under certain circumstances. What am I missing?”
What you are missing is that that is not true.
And this statement; “For anyone—including the president—who believes DACA would ever be the proper thing to do...”
So there is your assumption about Trump.
You can catch up by looking at the breaking news area here at FR.