Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ciaphas Cain

I have a different view.

The prime focus of God’s actions was to protect the Israelites who were chosen to bring forth the Messiah, God in the flesh, to redeem souls from death, to honor the promise made to the regretful and remorseful Adam by the appearance of a Second Adam who would be without sin.

When viewed thus, all the criticisms of God being ‘a vengeful God’ are put into context. God’s actions were to protect the coming of the Messiah.


9 posted on 01/10/2018 6:29:49 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

Had never thought of that. I thank you for something new to ruminate upon this morning.


13 posted on 01/10/2018 7:47:20 AM PST by Ciaphas Cain (Liberalism, as with all else evil, can never create. It can only corrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

A theological question I’ve had recently is this:

Since God knows all, and Jesus was not a “let me revise the plan” thing because of the fall of mankind, and he knows all as an infinite and omnipotent God, why on His green earth did he put that tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the Garden? If that tree wasn’t there, would the serpent be able to convince Eve to eat of it, and share with Adam? Would there still be sin in the world?


22 posted on 01/10/2018 12:53:58 PM PST by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson