That’s odd. He was on CNN this morning and refused to discuss the evidence at all. So he’s either full of sh!t or he’s losing his mind.
.
What is your problem?
You make no sense at all.
Here you are again, using the same arguments against Arpaio as the liberals are using against Trump. Losing his mind? Really?
Arpaio was never gonna get a fair hearing of the evidence from CNN, but he invited them to come see him any time and he would show them the evidence. So your intimation that he isn’t interested in discussing the evidence is..... mistaken.
Just once, I’d love to see you verbally attack a leftist Dem with the same ferocity that you always seem to have for the less than mainstream Republicans.
I don’t see it happening.
I have seen some of the evidence, including the original BC that was used to copy key information. I have verified that the angle of the print for key fields does not match other fields but does match exactly the angle of all of the print on the copied BC. So he is not full of sh!t.
Although it is appropriate to acknowledge the investigation, why go into details that the Democrat Media would distort and use as a distraction. They would do that by attacking what he says, not the actual evidence. If the Democrat media wants to raise an issue, make them use the evidence as a source, not quotes from Arpaio.
IIRC, your FR About page used to have local photos, and references to Ian T. I assume you know something about that locale.
Anna Obama lived in Seattle in 1961. What months I don’t know. How long has free health care been available in Canada? Is it possible for an American citizen to have engaged in birth tourism, to the city one is sent to when Hell is not enough punishment, in 1961?