What I really want to do right now is go back and find all my comments and ping those who argued so vehemently with me and claimed I was either stupid, a conspiracy wingnut, or a Russian Troll for even questioning the official *stories* that kept (and now keep) changing and changing.
Perhaps at some point we will know the truth.
My guess is that he was an arms dealer (no one makes millions off video poker) who set up a buy with some unknown people who were up to no good. Allegedly a Saudi prince was staying in the four seasons, just upstairs. Instead of cash, Paddock got a bullet for his troubles and for some reason the perps opened fire on the crowd. Perhaps that was their plan all along. A diversion for the real action. Who knows?
What I do know is that the stories put out in the days following the shooting were unadulterated bullshit.
And they wonder why we stop believing *anything* they say...
Post 19
Agreed. FBI line was full of lies.
The official story was ludicrous, and you were completely right to question it. I noticed at the time that the trolls were out in force telling us to trust the government.
The story hasn’t got better with time. Endless edits and elaborations. And the statement that the hotel had no CCTV in the corridor of that floor. Such rubbish. No one goes anywhere in those big hotels without being seen in security footage.
How many people would have to be involved in the cover-up? As many as were involved in Kennedy’s assassination?