That would be a good start. I would even take a hard look at the reforms Norman Foerster was advocating in the 1930's and 1940's.
Arguing that colleges in the 1920's and '30's were in a full-scale revolt against tradition and increasingly adopting utilitarian curricula that made them essentially glorified vocational/technical schools, Foerster advocated that the undergraduate curriculum cover "history, philosophy, science, and language and literature, with an emphasis on the Great Books that have stood the test of time. He also argued that specialization and the pursuit of majors be put off until graduate school. See his book The Humanities and the Common Man (1946).
wheres he been for 40 years ???
I once had a 1930s textbook with HS studiesincluding Latin, Greek, German, Trig, Calculus, European Historythe works!
Just two inches thick, this college graduate doesn't understand most of it.
≡≡8-O
So the average person be 24 before you began to learn anything useful.
Did he suggest how you were suppose to actually pay for all this "education"?