I figure schooling is the negotiable part. If we allow any form of waivers for kids--not the illegal families--then we need to negotate on a. ages (arrived under 8-12 year old?), b. arrival date (pre 2008?), c. are they in school now?, etc. I'd push for 8 years old, pre-2018 so we are only talking about school-age kids, still in school. Since none over 18, they don't need work permits. And, being nice, let them finish current school year before going home.
>
I am a business owner, I see no problem with using eVerify. Good corporate citizenship should demand it. It is not a big burden. Okay, make it a $100K fine and 5 years in prison for each illegal alien you temporarily or permanently hire without using eVerify, no such penalty if you use eVerify and they are not spotted at the time.
I figure schooling is the negotiable part. If we allow any form of waivers for kids—not the illegal families—then we need to negotate on a. ages (arrived under 8-12 year old?), b. arrival date (pre 2008?), c. are they in school now?, etc. I’d push for 8 years old, pre-2018 so we are only talking about school-age kids, still in school. Since none over 18, they don’t need work permits. And, being nice, let them finish current school year before going home.
>
That’s great, *YOU* don’t have a problem with eVerify. Guess NP then ‘supplying’ people h’care, being their CPA, and a host of other govt mandates.
I have yet to see ANY ‘voluntary’ govt program remain the same.
That doesn’t negate the other points I raised, the biggest being “*NO* Constitutional authority”; least of all GOVT ‘permission’.
YOU and your biz interest(s) wish to lock-hips w/ any govt agency to proudly proclaim ‘eVerify member since...’, knock yourself out. But to flip Federalism on its head for the sake of covering Fedzilla’s @ss for failing to do its JOB (which it has shown, time and time again, as capable but unwilling) is another.