Posted on 01/23/2018 4:44:34 PM PST by markomalley
Obama administration Director of National Intelligence James Clapper held a meeting in his last days in office to discuss the idea of going to a Supreme Court justice to block President Donald Trump’s inauguration, according to a high-level member of the intelligence community who spoke with a Big League Politics source.
Clapper discussed blocking the inauguration on the grounds that Trump was an illegitimate president due to alleged Russian interference in the election, according to the sources. It is not known whether Clapper ever actually convened a meeting with a Supreme Court justice to discuss the Russia case, or whether he simply discussed the idea of doing so. By the time Trump entered office on January 20, the Russia narrative was already underway.
A high-level member of the intelligence community who witnessed the meeting said that Clapper discussed going to one of three female Supreme Court justices to make the case that alleged Russian interference could invalidate Trump’s claim to the presidency.
Here’s a text the witness sent to BLP’s source:
Here’s another text the witness sent to BLP’s source around the same time, describing how the Deep State was making General Michael Flynn a “rising target” for his alleged involvement with Russians, and stating that House Speaker Paul Ryan is a “wild card” in the Deep State wars.
Big League Politics recently reported on an audiotape in which Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh admitted that slain DNC staffer Seth Rich was the source for Wikileaks’ release of DNC emails in 2016, not a Russian hack. Hersh also said that Clapper and Obama administration CIA director John Brennan helped to create the Russia narrative against Trump.
As Big League Politics reported: real estate mogul Timothy Blixseth claims that he saw records from CIA and NSA whistleblower Dennis Montgomery proving that Clapper and Obama CIA director John Brennan oversaw repeated spying on the phone calls of President Donald Trump and millions of other private American citizens, including Supreme Court Justice John Roberts. Fired former FBI director James Comey received evidence from the whistleblower’s lawyer but sat on it.
In an audiotaped interview — conducted before Trump ever ran for president — Blixseth spoke to former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and detective Mike Zullo. The audio was released in connection with a civil contempt case that the Department of Justice filed against Arpaio. The audio of this conversation appears to only be preserved in one location on the Internet, on a whistleblower Soundcloud page.
“This guy showed me 900 million phone calls. And I see myself in there. I see people I know. I see Donald Trump in there a zillion times, and Bloomberg is in there,” Blixseth said on the tape, referring to information that Montgomery allegedly showed him.
“He’s a very genius computer guy,” Blixseth said of Montgomery. “What they did is, they were actually working for the CIA. And they mask it as — I’m sure you’ll remember this — the contracts with the CIA, of which I had many copies, said that they were decoding Al-Jazeera television, said that there was broadcast embedded, remember that? Owned by Gore? Al Gore’s got part of it now. But it was all bullshit. That was bullshit. That was a front by the CIA. And this guy [Montgomery] worked for Brennan and Clapper. Those were the two guys running it,” Timothy Blixseth told Arpaio and Zullo on the tape.
“He started out in 2004 with another partner in Reno, Nevada, called eTreppid. They collected about $40 million from the CIA. Top security clearance. All kinds of letters…In 2006 they started a new company that [my ex-wife] owns, and they started doing the same business for the government. What it really turns out they were doing is they were hacking into all of America.
Big League Politics called the listed number for eTreppid Technologies, but we were told that Montgomery no longer works there. “That company closed down years ago, sir,” a representative said of eTreppid Technologies. When asked what the company is called now, the representative said, “I’m sorry, I can’t discuss any more with you.”
Blixseth claimed in his conversation with Zullo and Arpaio that Brennan and Clapper were running the operation.
“Everything they said they didn’t do, that Brennan said recently, mainly Clapper. It’s all bullshit. And I’ve got it right here,” Blixseth said.
On the explosive tapes, Blixseth walks Arpaio and Zullo through the details of the program on a computer screen. At one point, the three begin pulling up specific names of targeted individuals.
“You know who that guy is? That’s the head of the FISA court they hacked into, Reggie Walton,” Blixseth tells the investigators.
“John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, was hacked,” Blixseth tells Arpaio and Zullo.
Insiders have always been skeptical of Roberts’ motives for siding with President Obama on the 2012 Obamacare case. While there’s still no available evidence that Roberts was blackmailed, the allegation that he was “hacked” by Obama officials provides some more context into the justice’s controversial career.
Remember - John Roberts as Chief Justice is the one and only means of oversight for FISC and he appointed last four (4) Obama + Clinton appointed Judges to the Court. Contreas was recused *by* the Court. Roberts has some ‘splainin’ to do!
Clapper discussed going to one of three female Supreme Court justices
..... This sounds like something that would have been discussed in that so called newly revealed “Secret Society” within the DOJ and FBI.
Since Seymour Hersh is quoted, I’d say yes.
Standing up for the basic liberties this nation was founded on is not grandstanding.
He did so at a great personal cost which reflects his conviction to do what is right.
He is not a popularity contestant. But some people treat elections that way. It becomes about the chiseled jaw structure of Romney, or the oratory skills of Obama, rather than the content of someone’s character and the vision they have.
When people accept the reality that the modern media has been hijacked by murdering and perverted cultists who have a singular objective of absolute control, including over everyone’s very thoughts, then it follows that becoming a critical thinker is an essential component of regaining the liberties of which we have already been robbed.
That you buy into the narrative tells me that you are very susceptible to groupthink.
If Moore is a weak candidate, fine. If you do not agree with some of his views, fine too. But don’t take the side of the abortionists, anti-Christians, and pro-homosexual crowd and then pretend to an independently thinking conservative. It doesn’t jive.
Moore lost because this wicked generation prefers baby killers and sodomites to lead it more than Christians. And his opponents knew that modern-day, self-identifying Christians are some of the most gullible and easily manipulated demographic segments of the population.
Real conservatives should be commending men like Moore for standing up and fighting for what is right. He should not be stabbed in the back for it.
Sometimes the majority gets it wrong. When twelve spies spied out Canaan, ten reported that Israel could not defeat the inhabitants. Only two had the courage to believe God and do what He told them to do. Those two were the only ones of their generation that got to enter the Promised Land. The rest of the adults wandered in the wilderness and died until a new generation that had courage was ready to do what needed to be done.
I’ve been hearing my whole life, whenever a conservative candidate loses, conservatives need to just be a little bit more moderate. That philosophy pretty much led us to where we are today. And it’s not good.
Would it be better to run someone more charismatic than Moore? Sure. But don’t do it at the cost of conservatism.
Your comments go beyond criticizing his political strategies and methods. You’ve attacked his conservatism in the same manner his leftwing enemies did. If you are a conservative it ought to give you pause anytime you find yourself agreeing with and taking sides with the radical leftists.
So what is bigger then Fake News? Fake Intel
Then use that same fake intel to try an influence the courts. Sounds very familiar.
Maybe! BUT Roy Moore was never as popular in Alabama has we were lead to believe. I don’t like making excuses.
Moore couldn’t motivate the voters he needed to show up! That is JOB ONE of the candidate. Anything else is an excuse!
Sounds like what the Democrats feared Trump was doing to Biden. Nothing new under the sun...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.