“he is returning the power to We the People.”
WHICH is the ONE THING they will never allow.
For the record, I am not the author and the author is not a moderator.
What happened to all of the Tsars?
Take a bow. Awesome work.
“He’s doing the opposite - slowly weakening the DC infrastructure by pulling out Jenga pieces one by one.”
Let’s hope that he weakens it enough that it will take nearly forever to get it back to where it was when he took office. I would love to see everyone come to the realization that they like it better this way. It’s tough with this diabolical media.
Progressives: "The Wee People"
Obama Deep Staters: "The Wee-Weed Up People"
The Rats expect you to do exactly what they would do in the same situation.
“They expect Trump to abuse his executive power to fire Mueller, weaponize his various departments, make power alliances with GOPe and otherwise muscle his way into a position of control in DC.”
~~~~
This is interesting because I was thinking along the same lines last night. How in the hell do you move in and dis-arm the politicization (and thus source of corrupt decision making) in the FBI/DOJ and agencies recently hinted (strongly) in recent news for corrupt activities WITHOUT doing the same thing yourself?
I didn’t make the jump to considering that it’s a trap. Perhaps they strategy on their part was considered a win/win. Either Trump lets them keep the power that Obama/Hillary regime gave them, and they stay weaponized, or Trump moves in to overthrow their power, and they have people and procedures in place to make him pay for it.
Thrump is threading the needle between giving them neither win.
This explains why there has been so much press from capital hill oversignt committees lately, with no action yet, which has been frustrating me so much lately. The information IS the battle. Action is not. Not yet... when it would appear to be unilateral and would be framed by the media as pre-emptive, even though it’s not
So transparent. Mueller is still on the job, so where is the beef?
Political Tai Chi in action!
Trump aked by reportorette at Davos “Will you be well received there?” “I ALREADY AM!”
DOW hits new record high.
FBI “lost” texts ALL recovered by OIG Horowitz.
Shumer Shutdown a colossal flop, Dems cave without gaining anything in return
AND THEN....out pops a story alleging that MONTHS AGO Trump threatened to fire Mueller, something they would have gleefully spattered across page 1 and dominated CNN for days at the time.
So WHY does this story just pop out when a distraction is most needed by the Dems/Media who are losing on every other front?
Who decided this was THE lead story for the 4AM daily MSM talking points?
Do you believe this is just good luck, or coincidence?
Think again.
Beautiful.
Superbly stated.
“That we should wish to cast him down and have no one in his place is not a thought that occurs to his mind.” —Gandalf
...They expect Trump to abuse his executive power to fire Mueller, weaponize his various departments, make power alliances with GOPe and otherwise muscle his way into a position of control in DC...
That’s simply because it’s the way Democrats and other liberals do business.
For years we were warned that if we attempted to stop the communist/socialist/one-world takeover of our country, arrest the Clintons, arrest Obama, there would be massive rioting throughout the land. I believe Antifa and BLM are probably the seeds for this.
Had Trump taken office and immediately gone full speed ahead in draining the swamp, the riots would have been set off in a big way. By dribbling out the criminal deeds of the deep state bit by bit...and allowing the public to absorb the data slowly...he will probably avoid the rioting. He’s been giving us a new atrocity almost daily.
What we know for sure of Trump’s ways, he would have fired Sessions quickly for non-performance had it not been the game plan all along.
The “bombshell” story is not even front and center on the Yahoo news page.
That just proves how almost no one gives a rat’s @ss about what the NYT is peddling.
All the world now has an example of what can happen when, under limited government and individual freedom, citizens--whether as individuals, small businesses, or heads of large corporations--will make decisions which benefit both themselves and the entire population.
Remember that great moral philosopher, Adam Smith? What was described above sums up his conclusions about economic outcomes when each citizen pursues his own personal benefits, and the outcome benefits his neighbors and the entire society.
Well done indeed.
L
ON.