Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grampa Dave

Bump! To paraphrase her, if they did this now, how many times have they done this in the past? So I will add this: How many convictions over the decades have been tainted with false information being inserted into search warrants? How may convictions have been obtained by perjured courtroom testimony?


17 posted on 01/26/2018 10:02:57 AM PST by Enterprise (Do away with all symbols of past slavery. Start with the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

“Bump! To paraphrase her, if they did this now, how many times have they done this in the past? So I will add this: How many convictions over the decades have been tainted with false information being inserted into search warrants? How may convictions have been obtained by perjured courtroom testimony?”

Basically any convictions where the defendants didn’t plead guilty or “nolo contendere” based on FBI/DOJ findings in the past two decades could be set aside.

If they tried to lynch candidate/President Elect/President Trump, surely they would lynch anyone else they wanted to.


20 posted on 01/26/2018 10:29:48 AM PST by Grampa Dave (When is it OUR TURN to keep our own money and live our own dreams!!!!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson