Sex trafficking goes back way before the 1960s.
Blaming the Sixties isn't an easy vote-getter like it was in past decades. That's been true for a while now.
Here are all of his comments that the article transcribed from the audio. Tell me what's so bad about these, let alone what's *wrong* with any of them? ---
"We have a human trafficking crisis in our state and in this city and in our country because people are willing to purchase women, young women, and treat them like commodities. There is a market for it. Why is there? Because our culture has completely lost its way. The sexual revolution has led to exploitation of women on a scale that we would never have imagined, never have imagined,...."
"We must ... deliver a message to our culture that the false gospel of ‘anything goes’ ends in this road of slavery. It ends in the slavery and the exploitation of the most vulnerable among us. It ends in the slavery and exploitation of young women."
The sigher probably leans another way.
Wait until the Bush League Republicans begin beating him up.
Knee capping opponents of open borders and amnesty is their specialty.
Sex trafficking goes back way before the 1960s.
Blaming the Sixties isn't an easy vote-getter like it was in past decades. That's been true for a while now.
Oh yeah? This is just the first.
Here are all of his comments that the article transcribed from the audio. Tell me what's so bad about these, let alone what's *wrong* with any of them? ---
Because sex trafficking is a world wide problem that long predates the 1960's. What caused it before then?