Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats snag Republican Missouri House seat, lose 2 other contests in special election
St. Louis Dispatch ^ | 6 February 2018 | Jack Suntrup St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Posted on 02/06/2018 7:42:42 PM PST by napscoordinator

JEFFERSON CITY • Democrats made a dent in the GOP's super-majority in the Missouri House on Tuesday, swiping a Jefferson County-based district that had been held by a Republican.

Democrat Mike Revis snagged nearly 52 percent of the vote compared to Republican David Linton's 48 percent share, according to preliminary results from the Missouri Secretary of State.

According to the unofficial results, Republicans still took at least two out of four special election contests on Tuesday, winning decisively in two western Missouri districts.

In the 144th district, encompassing a patch of southeast Missouri, including Iron County and parts of Washington County, Democrat Jim Scaggs led Republican Chris Dinkins narrowly at 9:20 p.m. with 14 precincts left to report tallies.

The Democrats were elated by their flash of success, saying the victory in Jefferson County signaled more problems for the Republican brand going into the November elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: elections; missouri; republicans; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: napscoordinator

Money quote:

“Based on the unofficial results, Republicans held on to three other seats in four special elections on Tuesday, winning decisively in two western Missouri districts and narrowly in the southeast Missouri 144th District.”

I concede I don’t know much about Missouri politics, but seems like there’s an awful lot of handwringing for 75% success rate. I’d take that extrapolated writ large.


81 posted on 02/07/2018 10:19:52 PM PST by confederatecarpetbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevio; DoodleDawg; napscoordinator; LS; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; campaignPete R-CT; ...

Ultra low turnout, dem voters care more about these special elections.

They won’t hold it, this fag has 11 months to enjoy his office.


82 posted on 02/07/2018 11:16:50 PM PST by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: confederatecarpetbag

I agree 75 percent would be fine, IF 100 percent weren’t held by republicans before the election.


83 posted on 02/08/2018 6:29:41 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Dims are pumping money into these special elections. See this Politico article: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/10/democrats-special-elections-organizing-401365 bragging about it:

“The Democrats’ secret weapon to take back statehouses
The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee is pumping money and infrastructure into an array of legislative races. Special election results suggest it’s paying off.
By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE 02/10/2018 06:50 AM EST”

From the article:

“...the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee.. now working to coordinate efforts and partners... double its spending ... to $35 million...

“’...we’re able to show up to the table with a lot more resources,” said [DLCC head] Jessica Post...’Play big, create big competitive maps, we’ll help you fund the infrastructure, and we’ll come in and invest with our partner groups.’”

“....including Eric Holder at the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. Planned Parenthood ...League of Conservation Voters... Forward Majority super PAC [promised]$100 million into state races... The Democratic National Committee ... with infrastructure and staff... “

Article also quotes RSLC (Republican) as saying they will spend $45mm.


Special elections do and don’t mean a lot, but they offer most opportunity for concentrated campaign spending.


84 posted on 02/12/2018 12:43:16 PM PST by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicollo

Tonight I guess there are 2 in Minnesota at the state level. I would imagine we will continue our losing streak. My only problem is that we were on such a roll that it is sad to see it end. I understand all the funding and everything, but really this has everything to do with conservatives sitting out these elections.


85 posted on 02/12/2018 3:06:37 PM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson