Posted on 02/08/2018 9:45:58 AM PST by Kaslin
It doesn’t take much for liberals to lose their cool, or their minds. Pretty much all you have to do is disagree with them politically, then duck and cover. But this week saw more than the usual share of insanity from our friends on the left, which is worthy of note.
The release of the memo from the Republican majority on the House Intelligence Committee must’ve put a bur under the saddle of their instability because since Friday they’ve been in full gallop of crazy, unable or unwilling to stop.
First, the Democrats on the committee, after claiming the release of the Republican’s memo would be damaging to national security because it revealed “sources and methods” for gathering intelligence (it did neither), are now set to release their own memo – a reported 10-page defense of the government using partisan rumors peddled by Russian government officials to spy on Americans. It’ll be an amusing, if not informative, read.
The release of the Democrats’ memo was supported unanimously by the Intelligence Committee, unlike the Republican memo. No Democrats wanted the public to know what their government was up to when it was the GOP telling the story, but zero Republicans made any attempt to stop the liberals from telling their side. Weird, right?
Yes, some liberal journalists are grousing about how the memos weren’t released simultaneously, but they are lying to the public. There is a very specific procedure for releasing information of this sort that requires time for the various interested parties to have a chance to weigh in. Democrats did not start the procedure for their memo until long after trying to block the Republicans' memo. So they, the Democrats, are responsible for their memo’s delay, not partisan actions by Republicans. You won’t hear that on MSNBC or CNN.
Still, in response to the release of the GOP memo, there are reports of anger inside the FBI. There are even reports that the anger “could cause spy agencies to start sharing less with Congress.” That’s exactly the problem with the FBI now – the arrogance that accompanies unchecked power that believes itself above accountability.
Were the FBI, or any intelligence agency, to refuse constitutional oversight of Congress, that agency needs to be gutted and eliminated. It would need to be replaced, they serve a vital purpose when they follow the rules, but obstructing oversight would make them a rogue agency that has to be destroyed.
The lead Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, was exposed this week as being so desperate to find dirt on Donald Trump that he was willing to have staff coordinate with a foreign government to get it. It turned out that he fell for a prank, but it’s telling that he would do exactly what he’s accusing Trump of doing in order to “get” the president. The media mostly yawned at the hypocrisy.
Not to be outdone, the media seized on a joke President Trump told in Ohio, calling Democrats not applauding good economic news in the State of the Union Address “treason.” It was clearly a joke in response to something someone in the crowd said, but you’d think he was calling for the execution of liberals by the reaction to it. Of course, liberals have a rather deep recent history of calling Republicans traitors, to the cheers of (and in coordination with) the media, but why let the facts stand in the way of a good pearl clutching?
Hysterically, alleged conservatives even engaged their fainting couches over the joke. Bill Kristol, having difficulty adapting to not mattering anymore, said the joke was “disgraceful” and suggested Congress censure the President. It’s sad to watch people so desperate for the attention they once earned through their ideas now clamor for it with temper tantrums. Hatred, it seems, trumps logic.
Not to be outdone, the media seized on a joke President Trump told in Ohio, calling Democrats not applauding good economic news in the State of the Union Address “treason.” It was clearly a joke in response to something someone in the crowd said, but you’d think he was calling for the execution of liberals by the reaction to it. Of course, liberals have a rather deep recent history of calling Republicans traitors, to the cheers of (and in coordination with) the media, but why let the facts stand in the way of a good pearl clutching?
Hysterically, alleged conservatives even engaged their fainting couches over the joke. Bill Kristol, having difficulty adapting to not mattering anymore, said the joke was “disgraceful” and suggested Congress censure the President. It’s sad to watch people so desperate for the attention they once earned through their ideas now clamor for it with temper tantrums. Hatred, it seems, trumps logic.
But don’t forget, what we’re dealing with, on the big scale of things, is not liberals vs conservatives.
Its deep state vs regular people.
Most of the “liberal against conservative” paradigm is fabricated theater to keep us in line.
Sure, the principles are real. And conservative principles make a lot more sense.
But the fact that we disagree on principles has been exploited by the elites. So that we direct our anger towards each other, meanwhile the puppet masters get away with murder.
Ditto.
The purpose of the Democrat Party is to elect thieves to public office so that they have access to the public treasuries in order to loot them.
Actually it did reveal sources and methods. The source was a paid political hack and the method was fabrication of a completely fictional story. The thing it damaged wasn't national security but rather Democratic party security and career security of the FBI supervisors who used it to get a FISA warrant.
"Conservative" versus "liberal" always has been a simplistic interpretation of what many used to call a "battle of ideas"!
Yes, there has been a "battle," but on one side were marshaled a vast army of self-described liberal/progressives, not all of them identifying as Democrats, but all devoting their energies and lives to an ideology which required conformity to a set of ideas which are antithetical to the very underlying premises of America's founding and the framing of its limited-government Constitution for a free society.
Stubborn dedication to that Progressive ideology, which overlooked national sovereignty in favor of "globalism," and favored--no, demanded--enlargement of government power rather than the strictly-limited government power enshrined in the Constitution that has dominated American politics for too long.
The battle has now been engaged by a giant and non-conformist figure, writ large on the world stage, who has challenged and threatened the tyrannical demands of Progressivism--demands for tyrannical conformity of thought, expression, along with submission of individual rights, and submission to government elites.
I do hope when Bill Kristol googles his name today, he comes across this article. ;)
You can’t lose what you never had!
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.