So you agree that rulings in favor of the baker and against the Teamsters would be an expansion of the 1st Amendment?
>> Expansion of the 1st Amendment via judicial meddling ought not be tolerated
>
> So you agree that rulings in favor of the baker and against the Teamsters would be an expansion of the 1st Amendment?
Yes — The 1st amendment ONLY constrains Congress, and the whole issue here is NOT “free speech” but rather “involuntary servitude”.