“If the above statement is true, this means a drastic cut in entitlement spending”
Assuming 30 million self-deporting Illegals, with some 75% of them on WELFARE, as well as other programs, the budget savings could be MASSIVE.
From FedGov, to states, to locals and schools, that will free up tens for billions of dollars from all sources that could go to improve the lives of AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Bingo Tcr.
IMHO PDJT is the master at that Econ principle of the most effective changes are at the margins. You can't get rid of the welfare state entirely, but if you have trimmed the roles and now you do not need to hire interpreters for up to 70 languages ( assume on a Union Payroll of which the Supremes will deal with soon at in regards to State and Federal workers ) and not have to deal with a plethora of diseases and needs you have cut your cost dramatically. We never hear the total "nut" of what all this immigration cost us, it is spread out within a bunch of programs. For instance the churches involved on the Fed payroll ( Yes Catholic as well ) helping these immigrants. If we have a policy akin to Australia or New Zealand like we used to have back in the day before LBJ fubar'd it, just think of what the savings could be...