An Oh Sh*t moment. May they all go straight to jail.
Posted on 02/12/2018 1:04:34 PM PST by mojito
February 8, 2018
The Honorable Susan Rice Senior Fellow, Belfer Center Harvard University 79 John F. Kennedy Street Cambridge, MA 02138
c/o Kathryn Ruemmler, Esq. Latham and Watkins LLP 555 Eleventh Street NW Washington, DC 20004
Dear Ambassador Rice:
The Senate Judiciary Committee has a constitutional duty to conduct oversight of the FBI and the broader Department of Justice. Part of that duty involves ensuring that law enforcement efforts are conducted without improper political influence. Accordingly , the Committee has been investigating the FBI's relationship with Christopher Steele during the time his work was funded by Hillary for America and the Democratic National Committee, as well as the FBI's reliance on his unverified third-hand allegations in the Bureau' s representations to courts.
As part of that effort, the Committee sent a request to the National Archives for records of meetings between President Obama and then-FBI Director Corney regarding the FBI's investigation of allegations of collusion between associates of Mr. Trump and the Russian government. In response, the Committee received classified and unclassified versions of an email you sent to yourself on January 20, 2017 - President Trump's inauguration day. If the timestamp is correct, you sent this email to yourself at 12:15pm , presumably a very short time before you departed the White House for the last time.
In this email to yourself, you purport to document a meeting that had taken place more than two weeks before, on January 5, 2017. You wrote:
"On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Corney and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present."
That meeting reportedly included a discussion of the Steele dossier and the FBI's investigation of its claims.1 Your email continued:
"President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities "by the book". The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book."
"From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia."
The next part of your email remains classified. After that, you wrote:
"The President asked Corney to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Corney said he would."
It strikes us as odd that, among your activities in the final moments on the final day of the Obama administration, you would feel the need to send yourself such an unusual email purporting to document a conversation involving President Obama and his interactions with the FBI regarding the Trump/Russia investigation. In addition, despite your claim that President Obama repeatedly told Mr. Corney to proceed " by the book," substantial questions have arisen about whether officials at the FBI, as well as at the Justice Department and the State Department, actually did proceed " by the book."
In order for the Committee to further assess the situation, please respond to the following by February 22, 2018:
1. Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email?
2. When did you first become aware of the FBI's investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump' s associates and Russia?
3. When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?
4. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama' s meeting with Mr. Corney about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?
5. Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?
6. Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?
7. During the meeting, did Mr. Corney or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?
8. During the meeting, did Mr. Corney describe the status of the FBI's relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?
9. When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?
10. When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele's efforts?
11. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was "not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective." Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI's investigation?
12. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Corney, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI's investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please contact Patrick Davis of Chairman Grassley' s staff at (202) 224-5225 or Lee Holmes of Chairman Graham's staff at (202) 224-5972 if you have any questions.
Susan Rice.... She has been playing fast and loose for a long time. Would be nice to see the Federal prosecutors going after her with her landing in prison for a while
I thought the same thing at first, but this was her recollection from the January 5th meeting that she memorialized in the email and then sent the email to herself on 1/20/17.
bump
“That seditious and hateful ideologue sat there with Trump in their post-election meeting, acting like such a gracious person, but was all the time plotting. This is clear. Meanwhile, initially Trump was genuinely complimentary to Obama after their meeting, stating that the meeting went way over time because they were having such a great conversation.”
My thoughts exactly. The man is a snake. I am looking forward to Obama being exposed to the world as the conman and criminal that he is. Plus I bet President Trump will lay out Obama’s true origin.
Whoa, at first I didn’t pay a great deal of attention to this. But people, this obvious CYA email she sent to herself was sent the day of the inauguration tow weeks after their collusion meeting.
So not your typical memo for posterity. Also, did she hold out hope until the last minute that Trump would somehow not actually be sworn in?
An Oh Sh*t moment. May they all go straight to jail.
Yes. We know he was involved. Get the evidence. Make the case.
There is nothing “honorable” about the liar Susan Rice.
So many gay white man angry faces. Pshaw! (as I waive my limp wrist in the air...)
Yup
All the rats have tried to cover their behinds and all it does is point to more criminality
OK, let's get real here: Trump has either threatened and/or promised key members - most likely using the very same weaponized IC - to support his swamp draining efforts. Of course he/they already have all the evidence they need ie the letters of inquiry are obviously crafted around the evidence in their possession.
Sh!t, I wouldn't put it past Trump to have already ordered a select team to secure both Hussein's & Cankle's servers. Think about it this way - if a national emergency has already been covertly declared, then those engaged in espionage and conspiracy to treason do not enjoy civil rights/due process protections. Rather, under war time protocols, it's incumbent upon the government to prosecute defensive action with all possible means.
When the full history of this operation is written 25-50 years hence, readers will probably be amazed at the multi-tiered approach that was taken to incorporate all available channels, both visible and secret.
Probably blumenthal, but the rest jumped on willingly knowing
susan rice is psychopathic liar
and take a promotion for it.
Mr. Corney. Yep.
Fox News Video: Susan Rice Memo Implicates Obama in Spying on Opposition Candidate Trump - With Dirty FISA Warrants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=hnIDF5rNMH0
If it had been by the book, then the President would not have been involved at all.
What Rice did is a transparent ploy that’s so pitiful it would embarrass a sixth grader. I keep asking, “How stupid do they think we are?”. They’re... deplorable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.