Worse.
In her confirmation hearings, Kegan testified that she would have an irreconcilable conflict of interest if the ACA ever got before the Court and committed that she would recuse if it did.
I have no idea why that is not grounds to impeach her.
It might be grounds - but whoever brought it up would be barbequed by the press (the thug arm of the democrat party) for being sexist.
Here's the real reason she's untouchable - I'm guessing - based her early writings and University of Chicago background that at some point she a communist was a sympathizer:
--
Kagan attended Princeton University, where she earned an A.B., summa cum laude in history in 1981. Among the subjects she studied was the socialist movement in New York City in the early 20th century.
She wrote a senior thesis under historian Sean Wilentz titled " To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900–1933". In it she wrote, "Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism's decline, still wish to change America."Above from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
*
PING.
gibsonguy wrote:
Good. I’m so sick of good people recusing while the Rats never do. The way Ginsburg has been shooting her mouth off she should recuse herself from any Trump related challenge. Hell, one of Obonogo’s appointees even helped write the ACA yet went on to rule on it when it hit the SC.
David wrote:
Worse.
In her confirmation hearings, Kegan testified that she would have an irreconcilable conflict of interest if the ACA ever got before the Court and committed that she would recuse if it did.
I have no idea why that is not grounds to impeach her.
........................................................................................
Thanks, David.
Spot on THAT.