[rktman]

HLN "conservative" host? Well maybe in some cases. But in this she's on it. Of course the counter would be that someone like shawn (talcum X) king would beg to differ with her. Or some shave head 16 year old from south FL.

[PGR88]

I’m sorry, but when I hear “S.E. Cupp” I think “C cup”

[robroys woman]

The whole thing is BLM redux. As tragic as the death of any child is, this is statistically a VERY rare occurrence, as is the shooting of an unarmed black man by police, which is one reason they get the press they do.

There are over 100,000 schools in the US, and even if a shooter does choose your school, which is extremely unlikely, it is equally unlikely that your child would be one of the victims. I’d focus more on your child wearing their seat belt than them being a school shooting victim. And stats prove the former is much more relevant to the actual death rate statistics of children killed in vehicle accidents than at school shootings.

And this particular shooting was about the utter failure and incompetence of law enforcement, not guns, or shooters, or schools.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

So, did she switch her positions yet again?

[Mr. K]

It pisses me off every time you hear one of these gun-grabbers arguing on TV and when they are called that they say “No one is calling for gun confiscation”

And I always wish the other person would scream “...YET, but that IS your final goal, isn’t it?”

[GOPBiker]

I am waiting to see what PDJT actually told AG Sessions to do about 'bump stocks'.

The favorite media meme is that they convert a semi-auto into a full auto and that is not true or even close.

The danger here is that some minor accessory that (in relation to the number of firearms) very few people bother with will be the camels nose under the tent to ban other parts because of some scary fantasy reason.

Where are the adults? Bowing to the hysterical, demented media demands to 'DO SOMETHING' is equivalent to giving in to your crying child because they are crying. WTF

[Lurkinanloomin]

Cupp is articulate and attractive and occasionally correct, but she is not conservative.

[TBP]

S.E. Cupp is completely right about this.

[marktwain]

Of course they are calling for gun confiscation.

Just not all at once, right away.

The confiscation they are calling for is incrementally gradually, step by step, over time.

They only want to register them
Restrict transfers
Ban certain guns
Limit magazine capacity
Prohibit carrying guns
Ban or limit ammo
Require them to be locked up

Then, if you break any of the above rules, they will confiscate them!

[apocalypto]

I don’t know if she is conservative. I have watched her show only three times (it’s on at a bad time for me), and each time I thought she was fair and interesting.

[Georgia Girl 2]

The ultimate objective of gun control is gun confiscation.

[Boomer]

Good article and right on the money. Let’s have that conversation so everyone can put their cards on the table for all to see. Maybe when everyone sees the left really does want to confiscate our firearms we can have the fight to end that too once and for all time.

[Osage Orange]

If Liberals think...taking all guns off the street..would be worth it...if it saved one life.

Why wouldn't it be worth it to deport all illegal aliens...if it could save one life???

[Old Teufel Hunden]

To tack onto what S.E. Cupp is talking about and how we hear terms like "weapons of war" I give you the following:



The above is an M40 sniper rifle, a weapon of war. Many of you might recognize it because it's a souped up Remington 700 bolt action rifle, commonly used in hunting.



Marine with an M870. You may know this as a Remington model 870 shotgun, one of the most common shotguns out there.

So next time you hear that they only want to ban weapons of war, think about the above two commonly used hunting guns....