Replies

Back in the day you would have. And in some locations, with a firearm issued to you if you didn’t have one. And the “well regulated” also meant that the militia needed to be organized. Which they were. That is the one thing lacking today - the people are not organized against a force of action by the government.

http://www.davekopel.org/2A/LawRev/american-revolution-against-british-gun-control.html

excerpts:

The [town’s] powder house would hold merchants’ reserves, large quantities stored by individuals, as well as powder for use by the local militia. Although colonial laws generally required militiamen (and sometimes all householders, too) to have their own firearm and a minimum quantity of powder, not everyone could afford it. Consequently, the government sometimes supplied “public arms” and powder to individual militiamen. Policies varied on whether militiamen who had been given public arms would keep them at home. Public arms would often be stored in a special armory, which might also be the powder house....

Five days after the Powder Alarm, on September 6, the militia of the towns of Worcester County a...took over the reins of government, and ordered the resignations of all militia officers, who had received their commissions from the Royal Governor. The officers promptly resigned and then received new commissions from the Worcester Convention. [GREAT!!]

That same day, the people of Suffolk County (which includes Boston) assembled and adopted the Suffolk Resolves. The 19-point Resolves ...took control of the local militia away from the Royal Governor (by replacing the Governor’s appointed officers with officers elected by the militia) and resolved to engage in group practice with arms at least weekly.

The First Continental Congress, which had just assembled in Philadelphia, unanimously endorsed the Suffolk Resolves and urged all the other colonies to send supplies to help the Bostonians.