Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: richardtavor
It's not a question of how much it would cost. My point is about the institutional barriers to making it happen, whether the cost is $10.00 per/ea or $10,000 per ea. Parents with with permits and training could, in a vacuum, provide armed security for free ... but it would never be allowed.
46 posted on 02/22/2018 2:02:38 PM PST by Tax-chick ("The societal moronization ... is profound and terrifying." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Obviously, there will have to be some type of support for it. My point is that it takes police at least 5 minutes to respond to a shooting minimum (usually more like 10 minutes).. To stop the shooting, I believe that schools have to be made hard targets. To do that on a federal level would cost billions. The cheapest would be to allow trained teachers (preferably with their own weapons) to respond immediately, or even better, act as a deterrent to would be shooters.) The alternative is to do nothing, and allow the carnage to continue. I have spent much time in Israel, and the students are protected everywhere by armed escorts . Teachers, soldiers, armed citizens, etc. It is true that they have spent enormous amounts of their wealth for this purpose because they are fighting terror. It seems to me that we also have terrorism, but we are fighting with what? After each of these shootings, the call for disarming Americans and doing away with the 2nd Amendment is greater. Soon, we will be forced to do something to prevent our schools,churches, (soft targets) from being attacked. The alternative that I suggest is the cheapest (in my humble opinion).


54 posted on 02/22/2018 2:56:17 PM PST by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson