[familyop]

Reno89519 wrote:
"Okay, if insist, then restrict non-servicemembers under 21."

How many of you agree with that? Quite a few other FReepers in the northeast have stated support for barring people 18-20 years of age from possessing long guns, lately. We've had some fairly heated and lengthy arguments over it in some threads.

[Maris Crane]

As long as we have 18 year olds in the military, it seems disingenuous to have such restrictions.

When they raise the age at the Pentagon, then we can discuss.