Just turned on CNN. The anchor was talking about how Nunes’ memo was “poorly written” and mentioned “conspiracy theories.” She was saying that the dossier was only one of many pieces of evidence used to obtain the warrant to spy on Trump’s associates. She also pointed out that it was renewed several times. Some of this is contrary to what’s been reported. If the underlying documents show what she’s saying to be false, will she and the rest at CNN cover the facts or will they embarrass themselves?
Now the male anchor is reporting that Schiff is saying the redactions to the Dem memo are not to protect sources and methods but are hiding facts. The female anchor just talked about Schiff as supporting the Justice Department as “not politicized and staffed by professionals” or words very similar to that.
Catherine Herridge pointed out a claim in the Dems’ memo that is at odds with Comey’s testimony. I don’t remember exactly what it was.
The people need the FACTS.
C”N”N will have Schiff on their Sunday show tomorrow.
It seem likely that one of the FACTS is that CNN, et al, is deliberately trying to mislead America with regard to much more than a political issue - it is trying to mislead America with regard to an attempted criminal overthrow of its government.
Unfortunately for our country, roughly the same number that voted for HRC will take CNN at its word or rely on the opinion of like-minded others.
The MSM will not provide equal time to defeat this effort to mislead future elections; it nust be formally resisted in the nation's courts of law or it will simply continue.