"It is totally one-sided," he said. "The Democrats are crying wolf over something they never raised as an issue when it comes to former union lawyers issuing decisions."
To: MarvinStinson
“There’s no way you can say that because a boardmember represented a client dealing with an issue that boardmember is forever foreclosed from deciding on that issue,” Hunter told the Washington Free Beacon.
“If you limited the pool of boardmembers based on if they had ever taken a stand on labor issues as an attorney, you’d have to appoint people with no experience in labor law.”
To: MarvinStinson
That’s a leftist wanker for you. They never let ‘tradition’ get in the way of ‘resistance.’
3 posted on
02/25/2018 7:02:49 AM PST by
Twotone
To: MarvinStinson
Message to the Neo-Marxist left: You're NOT in charge anymore. Deal with it.
4 posted on
02/25/2018 7:04:16 AM PST by
LIConFem
(I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
To: MarvinStinson
No Recusal! No Surrender! Man the barricades!
To: MarvinStinson
8 posted on
02/25/2018 9:09:01 AM PST by
Rusty0604
To: MarvinStinson
Everything 0bama and his Marxist regime did should be dismantled.
5.56mm
10 posted on
02/25/2018 10:48:59 AM PST by
M Kehoe
To: MarvinStinson
I read the column. It reminded me why this 80+ year old relic of the FDR administration must go. This five-member board has despotic power. It is unconstitutional. Period.
12 posted on
02/25/2018 1:44:50 PM PST by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson