Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butlerweave

No, it’s not dead. The injunction holds, the renewals continue, and the March 5 deadline is no longer.

The decision was unanimous; no dissenting opinions from the court. That decision, though, was whether or not to expedite the hearing to SCOTUS, not on the merits of the case.


17 posted on 02/26/2018 6:45:20 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: GIdget2004

No, it’s not dead. The injunction holds, the renewals continue, and the March 5 deadline is no longer.


Courts don’t have the authority to nullify the deadline. Their decision can be ignored.


20 posted on 02/26/2018 6:46:43 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

My problem is that this, clearly does not fall under their jurisdiction. EOs are exactly that. The judiciary has no right under the Constitution to weigh in.

The Supreme court should be obligated to say just that when presented with this and not allow procedural nonsense to interfere.


52 posted on 02/26/2018 7:02:28 AM PST by mindburglar (I have an above average brain stem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson