Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stormy Daniels sues Trump, says ‘hush agreement’ invalid because he never signed
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/stormy-daniels-sues-trump-says-hush-agreement-invalid- ^

Posted on 03/06/2018 7:11:18 PM PST by Blogger

Adult film star Stormy Daniels sued Donald Trump Tuesday, alleging that he never signed the nondisclosure agreement that his lawyer had arranged with her.

The civil suit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court and obtained by NBC News, alleges that her agreement not to disclose her "intimate" relationship with Trump is not valid because while both Daniels and Trump's attorney Michael Cohen signed it, Trump never did.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bimboeruption; california; metoo; stormydaniels; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: VA40

This is disgusting.


Her going back on her non-disclosure agreement or the thought that Trump might have been involved with her?

Given Trump’s history of horndoggery, it wouldn’t surprise me if it were true. My worry has always been how social conservatives would react to scandalous revelations during the general election in 2016. Most seem to brush these allegations off as lies.

What if they are revealed to be very likely true? My hope is that they’ll hold their noses and vote GOP anyway. Too many GOP pols are faithful husbands who reserve their betrayals for their voters.


21 posted on 03/06/2018 7:33:29 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Bill Clinton was asked questions about workplace sexual relations in a case dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace.

What is her lawsuit alleging? Rape? Workplace affair? That she says they had sex (for pay?) and he denies it?

What is the crime he’s accused of?


22 posted on 03/06/2018 7:33:45 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Wear an orange pin to mourn the victims of the Tide Pods Challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

This is just a gimmick to promote sales or download dollars for films probably have resided in obscurity for several years now. It’s a business plan.

Given Trump’s adversion towards subjecting himself to biohazards and what’s termed as a germophobia, it becomes doubtful that he would have taken steps to engage in sexual conduct with a pornographic actress who has had multiple partners. And those couplings have had multiple partners... Ad infinitum Ad nauseam...


23 posted on 03/06/2018 7:33:47 PM PST by Clutch Martin (Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancakes, just as every culture has its noodle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Better put some ice on it.

Everybody lies about sex.


24 posted on 03/06/2018 7:34:13 PM PST by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

She needs to post her Taxes for the year that she ‘allegedly’ received money from the lawyer. I don’t care until that’s revealed. If he Cheated on his wife BEFORE the Election, then thats water under the bridge. I don’t believe he did either.


25 posted on 03/06/2018 7:34:13 PM PST by Pagey (8 years of MISERY, Thanks to Valerie Jarrett. Wretched human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anton

She should be suing her Plastic Surgeon and her personal trainer and dietician.


26 posted on 03/06/2018 7:34:14 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

If she didn’t think the agreement was legal, she never should have signed it to begin with, or taken the money.


27 posted on 03/06/2018 7:34:15 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

There’s one major difference. Trump was not in office at the time of this situation and the courts have generally ruled that anything a president does before election is not going to be adjudicated while he’s president. The Paula Jones case was spurred by Clinton’s denials of past affairs which led to Monica Lewinski which happened while he was in office.

Trump’s issue is entirely as a private citizen. She can have her day in court but not until *after* he leaves office.


28 posted on 03/06/2018 7:34:54 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Donald Trump: Doing the work American politicians just won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Why are the Democrats concerned about this? During the Clinton White House intern days didn’t they keep saying telling us that ‘it’s just sex’?


29 posted on 03/06/2018 7:36:38 PM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

My high school business law tells me there was an offer (the written agreement), an acceptance (her signature), and consideration (the check) changed hands.

Sounds like a binding contract to me. Does this dummy think Trump signs every check?


30 posted on 03/06/2018 7:36:40 PM PST by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The agreement is in writing. Trump’s lawyer signs, but “DD” is never identified in the original document nor does he sign. So it seems that Stormy owes Trump’s attorney $130K since she signed a document with him that she wouldn’t disclose her affair with DD and now is breaking that agreement. Her agreement was with Mr. Cohen. Trump never signed an agreement. So truly, what can she sue him for?


31 posted on 03/06/2018 7:36:52 PM PST by Blogger (The causes are the left are never about caring about an issue. ItÂ’s always about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FirstFlaBn

Except the agreement was with Cohen. Trump doesn’t have a signature on that document. Truly can claim plausible deniability. If Cohen was his “fixer”, he might have a stipend to take care of distractions regardless if they are true or not.


32 posted on 03/06/2018 7:39:16 PM PST by Blogger (The causes are the left are never about caring about an issue. ItÂ’s always about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

If Donald Trump’s signature is not on the agreemment, there’s no cause for action.

He is not even a signatory to the agreement. Daniels can sue the attorney but she wouldn’t attract media attention.

After all, its easier suing a celebrity and nothing unusual here: they’re lawsuit magnets.

Comes with being rich and famous.


33 posted on 03/06/2018 7:41:49 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

Is she related to “Jack Daniels”? I ask because she sounds a little drunk, and greedy, and skanky (oh maybe one of Elliot Spitzer’s dates, eh?)


34 posted on 03/06/2018 7:44:25 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

She said he didn’t. He did. He didn’t. Who cares? Not me.


35 posted on 03/06/2018 7:44:27 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
This crap is never going to stop and I could link it back to having Fredo instead of Sonny as attorney general. There's no fear of any backlash from any of this garbage so why not keep slinging it, whether fact or fiction?

It would be quite different if the headlines right now were about pending indictments for treason involving the Clinton's, Obama’s, and anyone connected with these wretched, anti American monsters.

36 posted on 03/06/2018 7:45:27 PM PST by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

And, since they have her signature and testimony that nothing happened before this, she has no case. She’s just doing what she does. Prostituting herself for media attention.


37 posted on 03/06/2018 7:46:07 PM PST by Blogger (The causes are the left are never about caring about an issue. ItÂ’s always about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Unless there’s a video tape or video camera recording of the alleged affair, its just a porn star’s word against the word of the POTUS.

Yawn.


38 posted on 03/06/2018 7:47:46 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
IF true, it happened 12 years ago. Way before he was in office, unlike BJ who did it on the taxpayer's dime and in We the People's house. Whatever happened before last year is between him and his wife. It's none of my concern, nor should it be anyone else's.
39 posted on 03/06/2018 7:52:13 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Re “So cough up the money you took beyotch”. That could be the legal key that keeps her mouth shut if she freely took the money.

Don’t know how California state law is written on this issue but the signed letter looks like a valid legal agreement to me.

HOWEVER, is she were to prevail, it could open up the whole Pandora’s Box of Bill Clinton’s accusers, some of whom were reportedly paid for their silence. That would invalidate any silence on their part.

Ms. Stormy Daniels may be the person who finally destroys the legend and legacy of President Bill Clinton and his cuckholded crook wife Hillary. Bye-Bye 2020!


40 posted on 03/06/2018 7:52:49 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson