you’re taking the leftist meaning of “regulation” from the founder’s amendment. there’s a reason leftist’s twist the original meanings of words.
I am very pro 2A. I am correctly interpreting the meaning of the clause. My point is whether or not violent and/or crazy people can be well trained and responsible.
oh good. sorry i misread you. then we’re agreed that “well regulated” has no place in this debate, and that this law is a clear violation of the 2A, i.e., the law of the land.