Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

I am amazed that even after last night, people still don't get it. When Jeff Sessions said he has hired someone outside of Washington to look into all that congress has sent to him, what do you think that means? What does it take for people to get it? He is doing his job! #MAGA pic.twitter.com/0NfV3ECG23— Defender of 45-Commander N Chief (@Trump45awesome) March 8, 2018


4 posted on 03/08/2018 8:17:12 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

Lol...so many “trust sessions” Q-laid drinkers on twitter with their reputations in the crapper. Attention whoring morons all.


12 posted on 03/08/2018 8:20:37 AM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America...Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

When Jeff Sessions said he has hired someone outside of Washington to look into all that congress has sent to him, what do you think that means?

It means that he probably appointed Eric Holder to look in to this.

I am starting to lose faith, can’t help it, sorry


14 posted on 03/08/2018 8:22:03 AM PST by eyeamok (Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

The ONLY reason Sessions (reluctantly) assigned someone to look into it, is because he absolutely got HAMMERED by Congress during public testimony around 3 months ago. I watched it. He had to be pressured hard.

Same with Rosenstein near the same date.

These guys are BOTH dragging their feet. The eleventy-D chess theory guys are plain wrong. Lots of them overlap with the Qooks, or Q-nuts as I refer to them.

Sundance (Mark Bradman) at CTH has flashes of brilliance, but is often flat out wrong. Remember 2 weeks ago he was saying the video delay at the school shooting was a purposeful plot to allow them to hide evidence. Where did THAT go? Oh yeah, disappeared, like all his wrong pronouncements.

Doesn’t stop his cheerleading sycophants (aka, commenters) on that website from sucking on his bunghole, though. “Oh Sundance, thank you for your brilliance! I would be lost without you!!!” But disagree, or point out where Mark Bradman is wrong, poof, you’re gone.

Mark Bradman used to run a pro-hillary site, just 2-3 years ago. When he wasn’t working for Publix. “Oh Sundance! May I kiss your butt some more?”

Ha!


31 posted on 03/08/2018 8:42:13 AM PST by Basket_of_Deplorables (SEDITION! Obama DOJ colluded to try overthrow the President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

“What does it take for people to get it? He is doing his job!”

When I see some indictments handed down, I might believe it.


69 posted on 03/08/2018 9:21:52 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

I think there are people on this site (trolls) that post very negative and discouraging comments. Could they be NeverTrumpers? or not-as-bad Dims? I get tired of their neg comments esp since they are not realistic at all.


88 posted on 03/08/2018 9:59:13 AM PST by Karoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson