And again, you're playing word games in conflating something that is "complex," with a complex "function."
Certainly the structure of a snowflake is "complex," but all the characteristics of the snowflake's complexity are resident in the properties of water. "Irreducible Complexity" describes a structure that IS NOT explainable by the properties of the constituent parts.
And for the record "hate" was a typo. I meant to say your syllogism pulled irreducible complexity out of your "hat." Just like your statement "Every living thing starts from a single cell, so complexity obviously arises from simple." "Single" and "simple" are not synonymous, and you know it, but you wrote it anyway.
Then what part of an embryonic cell turning into a full-grown adult (whatever species) is “irreducibly complex”? We just figured out that mantises have 3D vision - why is that grounds to immediately declare it “irreducibly complex”?