Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It would be cheaper to hand out self-driving cars when they arrive. At what point to California's Democratic politicians say it's not worth it? (None.)
1 posted on 03/10/2018 6:33:11 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: reaganaut1

Cali-logic.


2 posted on 03/10/2018 6:36:42 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

This has nothing to do with transportation. I believe TPTB in Cali see the writing on the wall and are trying to scam what they can before the system collapses. $98B? Really? Give me a freaking break!


3 posted on 03/10/2018 6:39:56 AM PST by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I live in South Carolina ... I am NOT going to California (ever!) Tell me again why MY tax dollars should help California when they are not willing to DEPORT illegals. Should be some negotiating give and take here ... its a one way street for California. So its a one way street for me. Don’t fund this thing.


4 posted on 03/10/2018 6:40:28 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (We are getting even more than we voted for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Build it and they will come.

Too much even for Willie Green. Cost has doubled since it was pitched to the voters a decade ago.

Only liberals could love nineteenth-century transportation technology.

Bullet train? An embarrassment to snails and slugs.


6 posted on 03/10/2018 6:41:57 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

This thing is becoming a parody of liberal foolishness, yet they’ll still double down on it because they can never admit that everything they believe is flat wrong.


7 posted on 03/10/2018 6:43:09 AM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“On time, on budget, as designed.” Never before heard phrase from the government.


8 posted on 03/10/2018 6:44:28 AM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
You'll notice that there has been NO talk of the ill-conceived - but aptly named - Bullet Train between Detroit and Chicago. Criminals traveling between Detroit and Chicago with highly subsidized tickets would be a disastrous....faster delivery of opioids, and easier exchange of illegal weapons, hence 'Bullet Train'. Where is Senator 'Little Dick' Durbin?
::::Crickets::::
9 posted on 03/10/2018 6:44:48 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

>>At what point to California’s Democratic politicians say it’s not worth it?

When the lobbyists stop writing them checks and they stop getting sweetheart deals.


10 posted on 03/10/2018 6:44:52 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Wear an orange pin to mourn the victims of the Tide Pods Challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
So higher steel prices should double the price of this already massively over budget idiotic project.
11 posted on 03/10/2018 6:45:17 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

At that price one could hand out first class air tickets and limos to and from the airport to those who would use the train for the rest of their lives.


14 posted on 03/10/2018 6:46:48 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Hey - a billion here and a billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money!

Tip of the hat to the late great Sen. Everett Dirksen, only he was talking in millions.

15 posted on 03/10/2018 6:47:00 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
could rise as high as $98.1 billion

Which means that it will actually cost far more than $98.1 billion.

17 posted on 03/10/2018 6:47:47 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So this means $500 billion when all is said and done and a finish date of 2035+.

(See the VA Hospital in Aurora, CO for a smaller scale peoject.)


19 posted on 03/10/2018 6:51:07 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Fiasco.

23 posted on 03/10/2018 6:56:42 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Kill: Hollywood,google,CNN,TWITTER,FACEBOOK,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

***The price of the California bullet train project jumped sharply Friday when the state rail authority announced that the cost of connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco would be $77.3 billion and could rise as high as $98.1 billion — an uptick of at least $13 billion from estimates two years ago. ***

Somehow Boss Tweed’s Courthouse comes to mind.


24 posted on 03/10/2018 6:57:46 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Re-open the insane asylums, stop drugging the kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

And every bit of that violates the terms outlined in the original initiative. I bet the hot shot who spent his wealth to get it passed regrets it now


27 posted on 03/10/2018 6:59:40 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If they kept the route from la to San Francisco like planned, it wouldn’t be a problem. But they decided to go into rural areas of the state too. Dumb!!!


30 posted on 03/10/2018 7:02:40 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Technology has moved beyond fixed transportation infrastructure as surely as the Germans moved beyond the Maginot Line.

Watch this FIVE YEAR OLD video of acrobatic drones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2itwFJCgFQ

If you watched Musk’s boosters returning to Canaveral, you’ve seen one possibility. Musk has said this technology will be used for mass transit very soon.


31 posted on 03/10/2018 7:03:47 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

$98,000,000,000... and likely to go higher... All to shave about 20-30 in off of the overall trip from LA to SF... and seriously, how many people commute between those two cities on a regular basis?


34 posted on 03/10/2018 7:07:48 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Wouldn’t flying be better between big cities and use trains etc for moving people from airports to smaller towns, the downtown or the burbs?

It just seems to make more sense than to waste all this money and take over all this land. Nevermind the earthquake issue. But what the hell do I know.


36 posted on 03/10/2018 7:11:36 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson