Posted on 03/14/2018 4:18:55 PM PDT by PapaBear3625
The 4th Amendment? Are you sure?
I think that people would want to know whether someone is a man, thinking that he is a woman or vice versa.
Yeah exactly.
You’re right. It is coming.
Why aren’t “trans-women” simply satisfied with dating “trans-men”? Same reason, I guess, that the Sodomites are not satisfied finding a bakery which will bake their (alleged) wedding cake, but instead must try to force a Christian bakery to do it.
This is the evil enabled by “hate crime” legislation and civil rights legislation set up to turn various “protected” groups into super-citizens.
The Christian cannot refuse to make the homosexual wedding cake, but the Obama Department of Labor sued businesses that tried to make Muslims drive beer trucks and ring up alcohol. In short, Muslims could refuse work per their beliefs but Christians could not.
That’s aside from various civil rights commissions, including Colorado’s, saying the liberal atheist can refuse service per their beliefs to a Christian but the Christian cannot refuse service per “equal rights” legislation.
It creates an unfair tiered legal system in the name of fairness. Actually, liberals’ definition of equity is to create such an unfair legal system in order to make up for what they say is unfair.
won’t be much of a battle until the Democrats’ errors are undone in this executive order. Nobody will do it. They’re too afraid: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/21/executive-order-further-amendments-executive-order-11478-equal-employmen
All a person who uses a dating site has to do is ask “What is between your legs?”
I’d hardly call Tinder a dating site. It’s for quick sex.
Or, why can’t homo men meet up with homo women? Wouldn’t it all even out?
Some depraved and deranged dude dishonestly pretends to be a woman ... and the dating service will have none of it.
Good for the dating service.
He probably does when he can’t find someone on tinder.
The request is as unfair as allowing transgender males to compete as females in the International Olympics.
Thanks PapaBear3625. Shows up on the wrong person's doorstep with the wrong junk, and "she" won't have to worry about "her" lawsuit outcome. And good riddance.
You're probably right. Sad. However, it will just mean that people will have to state specifically in their profile that they are not interested in transgenders, etc. I don't know much about online dating, but I'm assuming there are disclosure requirements, right?
that sounds like Cynthia Nixon and her ‘wife’.
You mean “What was between your legs at birth?”
I likes:
long walks in the moon light, cuddling ..oh, and a women who has a penis.
Nope. Heterosexual men will be expected to date and accept the advances of “heterosexual” trans “women” without complaint or be branded as “transphobic,” because “trans women are women.” That position is already being advanced in the Twitter feverswamps.
This happened before with eHarmony. They were sued in New Jersey by a queer who wanted to be matched to other queers by eHarmony.
I guess the “gay” bars had run their course?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.