I despise them and pity them at the same time.
Those sure are three ugly women in that picture.
Bkmrk.
Thesis, Anti-thesis, Synthesis
8) Wrong Side Of History
aka These Kids Will Be In Charge Soon And They Will Sort Your A** Out.
This may tie into #4 and #7 but absent any cogent argument, point of fact or law, I’m seeing a lot of You Conservative/Constitutionalist Scum Will Be Dead Soon And We’ll Do What We Like posts from fainting-couch lefties.
Obviously, they’re ignoring demographics, Census figures, etc. in order to claim that there will be a mass extinction soon. And will the extinction somehow choose victims by political affiliation?
The Wrong Side Of History argument was a favorite of the gay marriage crowd. They were unable, of course, to explain how humanity survived and thrived with a) actual marriage being the custom in almost every culture regardless of language, ethnicity, geography, etc. and b) how couples whose anatomy matched planned on procreating.
And what does The Wrong Side Of History even mean? Is a Douglas Brinkley going to write nasty things about us? Isn’t he already doing that? Isn’t history simply a record of events? How can there be any right or wrong associated with if IF it’s history and not propaganda? The Wrong Side Of History might be called preemptive virtue signaling ie the political correct types are claiming to be correct before time elapses or they will do their usual thumb-on-the-scale routine to ensure they are on the ‘right’ side.
A good example: some acquaintance of mine was in a snit because the Parkland student, a skinhead lesbian, was described as, er, a skinhead lesbian. The ‘skinhead’ part was obvious to all. The lesbian part came from the student herself as she had been one of these sexuality-before-all types organizing clubs etc. And so, she was a skinhead lesbian by universal agreement including that of the skinhead lesbian.
This simply could not stand for the acquaintance, who railed against the description and, as above, declared that those who referred to the student as such were ‘cavemen who are dying out’ and...wait for it...on the wrong side of history.
I admit, for two days I considered asking simply ‘Which descriptor is inaccurate?’ but the only answer would have been more self-regarding vitriol.
too bad about Kathleen Parker; she was super hot when she was young...
“Libsplaining”
Thank you. Been trying to figure out how to deal with the Leftist tactic of “you oppose X? Well then you want to murder puppies!” which is such a rhetorical non-sequitur I have trouble addressing it. Having a label, based on their own invented labels (and thus instantly clear what it means), concisely snaps the delusion into focus.
Conservatives have to become louder and more aggressive in getting the message out. Far too many times, our side tends to shrink from a fight, when that fight should be taken to the darkside.
None of that crap works at silencing anything. We are on to you in a big way and not shutting up no matter how much of a hissy fit you throw. Collapse on the ground and beat your heads into the cement. It may help improve the sourpuss looks plastered on all your faces. -- Better yet, HOLD YOUR BREATH AND REALLY SHOW US !!
Such uneducated, living-in-the-past, reactionary closed-minded, mean-spirited, unloving low-IQ cultists are simply not fit for membership in the currently emerging. social gospel-integrated, diversity-admiring, gibberish-ranting modernized church of the "real Christ" for modern church-politic-correct Buddha/Mohammed/booze/gay-tolerant congregations.
Eh? Is there an "Amen" on this?
Article seems spot-on, but I don’t see anything being done about it (like a law requiring Facebook and Google to respect the First Amendment)
I do not think those three have much to worry about from ‘sexist’ men...
bookmark
bkmk